Fall of Gilchrist... and fall of....

Fall of Gilchrist... and fall of....

Post by vignes1.. » Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:50:36


Very many times Australia lost 5 wickets for around 200, only ro be
saved by Gilchrist and one surviving front order batsmen.  The,
Gilchrist proved time and again that he was a capable bat to play with
the tail order as well.

Now, out of from Gilchrist and the brittle middle order cut down the
gap between Australia and other Test nations.  Although Hussey shows
very good signs to become a middle-order saviour, Australia appears to
pay for not injecting young *** in an organised manner.

Vicky:
[Australia can never be wriiten off]

 
 
 

Fall of Gilchrist... and fall of....

Post by Mad Hamis » Fri, 06 Jan 2006 18:46:02


Quote:

>Very many times Australia lost 5 wickets for around 200, only ro be
>saved by Gilchrist and one surviving front order batsmen.  The,
>Gilchrist proved time and again that he was a capable bat to play with
>the tail order as well.

>Now, out of from Gilchrist and the brittle middle order cut down the
>gap between Australia and other Test nations.  Although Hussey shows
>very good signs to become a middle-order saviour, Australia appears to
>pay for not injecting young *** in an organised manner.

You really might want to have a look at what has happened rather than
what you wish had happened.

Over the last 5-8 years there have been quite a few people introduced
into the Australian middle order.

The problem really is that we haven't found a hell of a lot of people
who've justified holding a spot.

--
"Hope is replaced by fear and dreams by survival, most of us get by."
Stuart Adamson 1958-2001

Mad Hamish
Hamish Laws