http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
Apologies if this is a repost.
http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
Apologies if this is a repost.
> Apologies if this is a repost.
Fran
>> http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
>> Apologies if this is a repost.
>No way am I paying Murdoch one bent penny.
Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Colin Kynoch
Who loves having Pay TV
> >> http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
> >> Apologies if this is a repost.
> >No way am I paying Murdoch one bent penny.
> A saying springs to mind.
> Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Sure it's less convenient but he's a total arse and it would annoy me
if I paid him anything deliberately when there was an alternative.
Fran
>> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
>> >> http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
>> >> Apologies if this is a repost.
>> >No way am I paying Murdoch one bent penny.
>> A saying springs to mind.
>> Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
>No. I weighed up the pros and cons, and there are enough people paying
>him now for me to get copies from if I want anything. There's also
>bittorent.
Colin Kynoch
> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
> >> >> http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
> >> >> Apologies if this is a repost.
> >> >No way am I paying Murdoch one bent penny.
> >> A saying springs to mind.
> >> Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
> >No. I weighed up the pros and cons, and there are enough people paying
> >him now for me to get copies from if I want anything. There's also
> >bittorent.
> So you find theft a perfectly acceptable activity Fran. Interesting.
> >Sure it's less convenient but he's a total arse and it would annoy me
> >if I paid him anything deliberately when there was an alternative.
> Theft!!
Fran
>> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
>> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
>> >> >> http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
>> >> >> Apologies if this is a repost.
>> >> >No way am I paying Murdoch one bent penny.
>> >> A saying springs to mind.
>> >> Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
>> >No. I weighed up the pros and cons, and there are enough people paying
>> >him now for me to get copies from if I want anything. There's also
>> >bittorent.
>> So you find theft a perfectly acceptable activity Fran. Interesting.
>> >Sure it's less convenient but he's a total arse and it would annoy me
>> >if I paid him anything deliberately when there was an alternative.
>> Theft!!
>Can you steal from thieves and blackmailers?
You appear to be stealing from Newscorp, PBL and Telstra
Colin Kynoch
> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
> >> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
> >> >> >> http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
> >> >> >> Apologies if this is a repost.
> >> >> >No way am I paying Murdoch one bent penny.
> >> >> A saying springs to mind.
> >> >> Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
> >> >No. I weighed up the pros and cons, and there are enough people paying
> >> >him now for me to get copies from if I want anything. There's also
> >> >bittorent.
> >> So you find theft a perfectly acceptable activity Fran. Interesting.
> >> >Sure it's less convenient but he's a total arse and it would annoy me
> >> >if I paid him anything deliberately when there was an alternative.
> >> Theft!!
> >Can you steal from thieves and blackmailers?
> Yes.
> You appear to be stealing from Newscorp, PBL and Telstra
> Colin Kynoch
Fran
>> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
>> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
>> >> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
>> >> >> >> http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
>> >> >> >> Apologies if this is a repost.
>> >> >> >No way am I paying Murdoch one bent penny.
>> >> >> A saying springs to mind.
>> >> >> Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
>> >> >No. I weighed up the pros and cons, and there are enough people paying
>> >> >him now for me to get copies from if I want anything. There's also
>> >> >bittorent.
>> >> So you find theft a perfectly acceptable activity Fran. Interesting.
>> >> >Sure it's less convenient but he's a total arse and it would annoy me
>> >> >if I paid him anything deliberately when there was an alternative.
>> >> Theft!!
>> >Can you steal from thieves and blackmailers?
>> Yes.
>> You appear to be stealing from Newscorp, PBL and Telstra
>> Colin Kynoch
>Oh well, that's OK then
Colin Kynoch
> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
> >> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
> >> >> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
> >> >> >> >> http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
> >> >> >> >> Apologies if this is a repost.
> >> >> >> >No way am I paying Murdoch one bent penny.
> >> >> >> A saying springs to mind.
> >> >> >> Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
> >> >> >No. I weighed up the pros and cons, and there are enough people paying
> >> >> >him now for me to get copies from if I want anything. There's also
> >> >> >bittorent.
> >> >> So you find theft a perfectly acceptable activity Fran. Interesting.
> >> >> >Sure it's less convenient but he's a total arse and it would annoy me
> >> >> >if I paid him anything deliberately when there was an alternative.
> >> >> Theft!!
> >> >Can you steal from thieves and blackmailers?
> >> Yes.
> >> You appear to be stealing from Newscorp, PBL and Telstra
> >> Colin Kynoch
> >Oh well, that's OK then
> So where do you draw the line wrt to theft Fran?
Do Murdoch and his cohorts have a legitimate claim to the assets in
question?
(If not, it's not theft)
Is it theft if someone isn't deprived of something they possess?
Fran
>> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
>> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
>> >> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
>> >> >> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
>> >> >> >> >> http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
>> >> >> >> >> Apologies if this is a repost.
>> >> >> >> >No way am I paying Murdoch one bent penny.
>> >> >> >> A saying springs to mind.
>> >> >> >> Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
>> >> >> >No. I weighed up the pros and cons, and there are enough people paying
>> >> >> >him now for me to get copies from if I want anything. There's also
>> >> >> >bittorent.
>> >> >> So you find theft a perfectly acceptable activity Fran. Interesting.
>> >> >> >Sure it's less convenient but he's a total arse and it would annoy me
>> >> >> >if I paid him anything deliberately when there was an alternative.
>> >> >> Theft!!
>> >> >Can you steal from thieves and blackmailers?
>> >> Yes.
>> >> You appear to be stealing from Newscorp, PBL and Telstra
>> >> Colin Kynoch
>> >Oh well, that's OK then
>> So where do you draw the line wrt to theft Fran?
>You ask the wrong question here. The relevant questions are:
>Do Murdoch and his cohorts have a legitimate claim to the assets in
>question?
You are depriving them of revenue that is rightfully theirs. It is no
different to viewing pirated films, listening to pirated music or
using pirated software.
All are theft
Colin Kynoch
> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
> >> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
> >> >> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
> >> >> >> >> that the world would be a better place for knowing the following:
> >> >> >> >> >> http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/03/eyeballs_on_the.html
> >> >> >> >> >> Apologies if this is a repost.
> >> >> >> >> >No way am I paying Murdoch one bent penny.
> >> >> >> >> A saying springs to mind.
> >> >> >> >> Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
> >> >> >> >No. I weighed up the pros and cons, and there are enough people paying
> >> >> >> >him now for me to get copies from if I want anything. There's also
> >> >> >> >bittorent.
> >> >> >> So you find theft a perfectly acceptable activity Fran. Interesting.
> >> >> >> >Sure it's less convenient but he's a total arse and it would annoy me
> >> >> >> >if I paid him anything deliberately when there was an alternative.
> >> >> >> Theft!!
> >> >> >Can you steal from thieves and blackmailers?
> >> >> Yes.
> >> >> You appear to be stealing from Newscorp, PBL and Telstra
> >> >> Colin Kynoch
> >> >Oh well, that's OK then
> >> So where do you draw the line wrt to theft Fran?
> >You ask the wrong question here. The relevant questions are:
> >Do Murdoch and his cohorts have a legitimate claim to the assets in
> >question?
> Yes they do.
> >(If not, it's not theft)
> They do so therefore it is theft.
> Copyright laws make what you are doing illegal.
> You are depriving them of revenue that is rightfully theirs.
Fran
> Colin Kynoch
> > Yes they do.
> Not in my opinion, which is one of the things you were implicitly
> asking.
> It depends. In Murdoch's case, he is a pirate, his stuff is contraband,
> and he has no rights to property that bind me, IMO.
Murdoch's product is *not* contraband, it was legitimately purchased from
Cricket Australia. Perhaps you believe that CA should not have entered
into an agreement which left free-to-air viewer out in the cold (or
perhaps that they should not have been *allowed* to do so by legislation),
but that's a different thing.
Take your anger out on CA (and/or the government) rather than Murdoch.
GM
> > > >Do Murdoch and his cohorts have a legitimate claim to the assets in
> > > >question?
> > > Yes they do.
> > Not in my opinion, which is one of the things you were implicitly
> > asking.
> Why not? They paid perfectly good money to Cricket Australia for those
> broadcast rights.
> > It depends. In Murdoch's case, he is a pirate, his stuff is contraband,
> > and he has no rights to property that bind me, IMO.
> You're shooting at the wrong target, Fran.
> Murdoch's product is *not* contraband, it was legitimately purchased from
> Cricket Australia.
> GM
He is, without doubt, one of the nastiest pieces of work amongst the
seriously influential on the face of the planet Perhaps, three years
after he went bankrupt, his enterprises seized by people who really
hated him, if I came upon him sleeping rough on a park bench, I might
run out and buy a bootleg of one of his cricket games and gift wrap it
for him to trade for coffee. Until then, he gets nothing from me.
Fran
no fta tv station wants the cricket, remember the ashes? took a last minute
intervention to even get it on tv here. and sbs at that. even if the SA was
offered up for free to a tv network they wouldnt want it as it eats into
prime time. havent done for years and years , never will again.
all overseas tours are offered up to fta and they ignore them time and
again.
1. Gossip (cricket fans, don't bother)
2. Don't cricket fans need a job??
3. Cricket Fans Don't deserve this !!
4. for cricket fans....( i just having fun )
5. A tribute to a great non-Aussie fan of Aussie cricket.
7. AUSSIE FANS PROTEST TEAM'S 'RUDE BEHAVIOR'
8. Aus v Pak: Don't tell me that one day matches don't matter!
9. News for NZ cricket fans & Canterbury Cricket fans
10. Don't be Fooled by New Aussie Born Again Moral Agents
11. Criminal Aussies don't like their origins to be known
12. Don't see Starc on the Aussie lineup for T4
13. West Aussies, don't despair!