Sport Today

> The Aussie quicks needed to put in at least 7 or 8 overs and that is

> the only hope the Aussies had. You can't expect Lyon and Marshall to

> come in and start bamboozling the batsmen. It was a ridiculous

> strategy and its backfired. Also, the brand new hard ball may have

> done something but after even a few overs it completely loses its

> effectiveness on the Indian pitches. So, to bring in fast bowlers

> later on has no meaning. The time was (if at all one wants to bowl

> them) in the beginning. So, are we to believe that they will not bowl

> at all. If that's the case than I guess Watson is doing the right

> thing. But if they come to bowl later on, he has just ***ed up his

> strategy. And that too in a situation where at the very least he

> needed to get his strategy perfect.

> > The Aussie quicks needed to put in at least 7 or 8 overs and that is

> > the only hope the Aussies had. You can't expect Lyon and Marshall to

> > come in and start bamboozling the batsmen. It was a ridiculous

> > strategy and its backfired. Also, the brand new hard ball may have

> > done something but after even a few overs it completely loses its

> > effectiveness on the Indian pitches. So, to bring in fast bowlers

> > later on has no meaning. The time was (if at all one wants to bowl

> > them) in the beginning. So, are we to believe that they will not bowl

> > at all. If that's the case than I guess Watson is doing the right

> > thing. But if they come to bowl later on, he has just ***ed up his

> > strategy. And that too in a situation where at the very least he

> > needed to get his strategy perfect.

> You really are a moron, aren't you?- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> The Aussie quicks needed to put in at least 7 or 8 overs and that is
> the only hope the Aussies had. You can't expect Lyon and Marshall to
> come in and start bamboozling the batsmen. It was a ridiculous
> strategy and its backfired. Also, the brand new hard ball may have
> done something but after even a few overs it completely loses its
> effectiveness on the Indian pitches. So, to bring in fast bowlers
> later on has no meaning. The time was (if at all one wants to bowl
> them) in the beginning. So, are we to believe that they will not bowl
> at all. If that's the case than I guess Watson is doing the right
> thing. But if they come to bowl later on, he has just ***ed up his
> strategy. And that too in a situation where at the very least he
> needed to get his strategy perfect.

> > The Aussie quicks needed to put in at least 7 or 8 overs and that is
> > the only hope the Aussies had. You can't expect Lyon and Marshall to
> > come in and start bamboozling the batsmen. It was a ridiculous
> > strategy and its backfired. Also, the brand new hard ball may have
> > done something but after even a few overs it completely loses its
> > effectiveness on the Indian pitches. So, to bring in fast bowlers
> > later on has no meaning. The time was (if at all one wants to bowl
> > them) in the beginning. So, are we to believe that they will not bowl
> > at all. If that's the case than I guess Watson is doing the right
> > thing. But if they come to bowl later on, he has just ***ed up his
> > strategy. And that too in a situation where at the very least he
> > needed to get his strategy perfect.

> I bet that if Marshall were actually there, India would be all out by now.