Sport Today

by **Ravi** » Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:46:06

Surprise entrants - Pak, NZ

by **HVS** » Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:49:49

Quote:

> Surprise entrants - Pak, NZ

SL/Pak final, maybe?

Cheers,
Harvey

by **sdavmo** » Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:50:06

Quote:

> Surprise entrants - Pak, NZ

Going in I expect India vs SL for the final, but should it come
about I'll certainly enjoy seeing Pakistan vs NZ.
--
Cheers, SDM -- a 21st Century Schizoid Man
Systems Theory project website: http://SportToday.org/
find us on MySpace, GarageBand, Reverb Nation, Last FM, CDBaby
free MP3s of Systems Theory, Mike***son & Greg Amov music at
http://SportToday.org/

by **John Hal** » Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:36:52

In article

Quote:

>Surprise entrants - Pak, NZ

Pakistan aren't a surprise to me, but NZ certainly are.
--
John Hall

"The covers of this book are too far apart."
Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)

by T » Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:24:52

Quote:

> Pakistan aren't a surprise to me, but NZ certainly are.

Yes, NZ definitely pulled off a surprise victory against SA but Pak is
in the semis on merit. It's going to be a cracker semi that, Ind vs
Pak. Can't say the same for the other one. NZ gonna get smashed
good. :-(

by **linu** » Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:26:24

Quote:

> > Pakistan aren't a surprise to me, but NZ certainly are.

> Yes, NZ definitely pulled off a surprise victory against SA but Pak is
> in the semis on merit. It's going to be a cracker semi that, Ind vs
> Pak. Can't say the same for the other one. NZ gonna get smashed
> good. :-(

Woof, woof!

No worries mate. Rosy will prevail in the end and it will be Pak vs
NZ finals. Then Afridi will have a brilliant idea and will have
Akthar to bowl full tosses to Rosy and that will be that. Pallekele
all over again.

by **Ravi** » Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:32:39

Quote:

> > Surprise entrants - Pak, NZ

> SL/Pak final, maybe?

Good possibility of that

Quote:

> Cheers,
> Harvey

by **Ravi** » Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:40:02

Quote:

> In article

> >Surprise entrants - Pak, NZ

> Pakistan aren't a surprise to me, but NZ certainly are.
> --

At the start of the tournament, I expected Ind, SA, Aus and SL to most
certainly make it to the SF.
Ironically the oldest teams in cricket, Eng, Aus and WI are out. I
think that NZ can cause an upset. They have some good containing
bowlers (N. McCullum, Oram) and also wicket taking (Oram, Vettori).
The fielding adds a lot of pressure. If their top order fires (B.
McCullum, Ryder, Taylor, Guptill and also Styris) and if they bat
first, SL will be under pressure (like against Pak)

Ravi

Quote:

> John Hall

> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? "The covers of this book are too far apart."
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)

by **John Hal** » Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:56:06

In article

Quote:

>> Pakistan aren't a surprise to me, but NZ certainly are.

>Yes, NZ definitely pulled off a surprise victory against SA but Pak is
>in the semis on merit. It's going to be a cracker semi that, Ind vs
>Pak. Can't say the same for the other one. NZ gonna get smashed
>good. :-(

All logic says that. But then all logic said that they would be smashed
by SA.
--
John Hall

"The covers of this book are too far apart."
Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)

Sport Today

S/F Line-up Pak vs Ind, NZ vs SL

S/F Line-up Pak vs Ind, NZ vs SL

S/F Line-up Pak vs Ind, NZ vs SL

S/F Line-up Pak vs Ind, NZ vs SL

S/F Line-up Pak vs Ind, NZ vs SL

S/F Line-up Pak vs Ind, NZ vs SL

S/F Line-up Pak vs Ind, NZ vs SL

S/F Line-up Pak vs Ind, NZ vs SL

S/F Line-up Pak vs Ind, NZ vs SL

S/F Line-up Pak vs Ind, NZ vs SL