by wedge3.. » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:04:18
LOL
Piss off home you sooks.
by Dave -Turne » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:46:12
by kiwicric.. » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:42:59
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Mk74srFVb4&mode=related&search=
This is the catch that Rashid Latif claimed for which he was charged
by the ICC as a cheat.
Look where he drops the ball, picks up, and claimes the catch -- the
first phase of the catch, he has full control, but during the
"completion" act, he loses control.
Now, take a look at Ponting's catch in this, and Clarke's as well.
Look specifically at Clarke's, around roughly the 1:51 second mark.
The guy actually loses control, puts the ball on the ground, and uses
the grounded ball as a pivot and gets up to appeal!
Now tell me why this is not cheating, applying the same standards as
for the Rashid catch.
Oh, by the way, your guy Pup is a repeat offender. He did this just
two weeks ago in the one-day game against Hopkins.
Over to you.
by kiwicric.. » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:44:20
> > Harbhajan is the only player to have been charged in this game, which
> > reaffirms what Anil Kumble said - only one side played within the spirit of
> > the game.
> Hogg has also been charged. ?And while you are at it, why don't you
> look at this:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Mk74srFVb4&mode=related&search=
> This is the catch that Rashid Latif claimed for which he was charged
> by the ICC as a cheat.
> Look where he drops the ball, picks up, and claimes the catch -- the
> first phase of the catch, he has full control, but during the
> "completion" act, he loses control.
> Now, take a look at Ponting's catch in this, and Clarke's as well.
> Look specifically at Clarke's, around roughly the 1:51 second mark.
> The guy actually loses control, puts the ball on the ground, and uses
> the grounded ball as a pivot and gets up to appeal!
> Now tell me why this is not cheating, applying the same standards as
> for the Rashid catch.
> Oh, by the way, your guy Pup is a repeat offender. ?He did this just
> two weeks ago in the one-day game against Hopkins.
> Over to you.
http://cricketsbestvideos.blogspot.com/2008/01/cricket-video-india-vs...
by kiwicric.. » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:50:40
> > > Harbhajan is the only player to have been charged in this game, which
> > > reaffirms what Anil Kumble said - only one side played within the spirit of
> > > the game.
> > Hogg has also been charged. ?And while you are at it, why don't you
> > look at this:
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Mk74srFVb4&mode=related&search=
> > This is the catch that Rashid Latif claimed for which he was charged
> > by the ICC as a cheat.
> > Look where he drops the ball, picks up, and claimes the catch -- the
> > first phase of the catch, he has full control, but during the
> > "completion" act, he loses control.
> > Now, take a look at Ponting's catch in this, and Clarke's as well.
> > Look specifically at Clarke's, around roughly the 1:51 second mark.
> > The guy actually loses control, puts the ball on the ground, and uses
> > the grounded ball as a pivot and gets up to appeal!
> > Now tell me why this is not cheating, applying the same standards as
> > for the Rashid catch.
> > Oh, by the way, your guy Pup is a repeat offender. ?He did this just
> > two weeks ago in the one-day game against Hopkins.
> > Over to you.
> Sorry, forgot to provide you with a link:
> http://cricketsbestvideos.blogspot.com/2008/01/cricket-video-india-vs... Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
by Ian Galbrait » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:04:35
[snip]
>>> This is the catch that Rashid Latif claimed for which he was charged
>>> by the ICC as a cheat.
>>> Look where he drops the ball, picks up, and claimes the catch -- the
>>> first phase of the catch, he has full control, but during the
>>> "completion" act, he loses control.
>>> Now, take a look at Ponting's catch in this, and Clarke's as well.
>>> Look specifically at Clarke's, around roughly the 1:51 second mark.
>>> The guy actually loses control, puts the ball on the ground, and uses
>>> the grounded ball as a pivot and gets up to appeal!
>>> Now tell me why this is not cheating, applying the same standards as
>>> for the Rashid catch.
>>> Oh, by the way, your guy Pup is a repeat offender. ?He did this just
>>> two weeks ago in the one-day game against Hopkins.
>>> Over to you.
>> Sorry, forgot to provide you with a link:
>> http://cricketsbestvideos.blogspot.com/2008/01/cricket-video-india-vs... Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
> Oh, this is not just for Dave but for everyone. Look at the two
> videos very carefully. The first oen sets a rough standard for what
> is considered cheating. Now take a look at the claims by Ponting and
> Clarke in the second video. If you think they should not be labeled
> cheats based on the standard in the first, you need to explain why.
--
"We just don't recognise the most significant moments of our lives while
they're happening. At the time I thought there'd be other days. I didn't
realise that that was the only day." - Field of Dreams.
by kiwicric.. » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:07:38
> [snip]
> >>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Mk74srFVb4&mode=related&search=
> >>> This is the catch that Rashid Latif claimed for which he was charged
> >>> by the ICC as a cheat.
> >>> Look where he drops the ball, picks up, and claimes the catch -- the
> >>> first phase of the catch, he has full control, but during the
> >>> "completion" act, he loses control.
> >>> Now, take a look at Ponting's catch in this, and Clarke's as well.
> >>> Look specifically at Clarke's, around roughly the 1:51 second mark.
> >>> The guy actually loses control, puts the ball on the ground, and uses
> >>> the grounded ball as a pivot and gets up to appeal!
> >>> Now tell me why this is not cheating, applying the same standards as
> >>> for the Rashid catch.
> >>> Oh, by the way, your guy Pup is a repeat offender. ?He did this just
> >>> two weeks ago in the one-day game against Hopkins.
> >>> Over to you.
> >> Sorry, forgot to provide you with a link:
> >>http://cricketsbestvideos.blogspot.com/2008/01/cricket-video-india-vs... quoted text -
> >> - Show quoted text -
> > Oh, this is not just for Dave but for everyone. ?Look at the two
> > videos very carefully. ?The first oen sets a rough standard for what
> > is considered cheating. ?Now take a look at the claims by Ponting and
> > Clarke in the second video. ? If you think they should not be labeled
> > cheats based on the standard in the first, you need to explain why.
> The ball from Lateef actually dropped out of his hands to the ground and
> he picked it up, at no stage did that happen with either Clarke or
> Ponting.
> --
> "We just don't recognise the most significant moments of our lives while
> they're happening. At the time I thought there'd be other days. I didn't
> realise that that was the only day." - Field of Dreams.- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
by Ian Galbrait » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:50:47
[snip]
--
"I'm not an ***! I don't want to create responsible shows with lawyers
in them. I want to invade people's dreams." - Joss Whedon
by Geoff Muldoo » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:54:01
GM
PS. The All Blacks are chokers.
by dechuck » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:11:51
> > Harbhajan is the only player to have been charged in this game, which
> > reaffirms what Anil Kumble said - only one side played within the spirit
> > of
> > the game.
> Hogg has also been charged. And while you are at it, why don't you
> look at this:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Mk74srFVb4&mode=related&search=
> This is the catch that Rashid Latif claimed for which he was charged
> by the ICC as a cheat.
> Look where he drops the ball, picks up, and claimes the catch -- the
> first phase of the catch, he has full control, but during the
> "completion" act, he loses control.
> Now, take a look at Ponting's catch in this, and Clarke's as well.
> Look specifically at Clarke's, around roughly the 1:51 second mark.
> The guy actually loses control, puts the ball on the ground, and uses
> the grounded ball as a pivot and gets up to appeal!
> Now tell me why this is not cheating, applying the same standards as
> for the Rashid catch.
> Oh, by the way, your guy Pup is a repeat offender. He did this just
> two weeks ago in the one-day game against Hopkins.
> Over to you.
http://cricketsbestvideos.blogspot.com/2008/01/cricket-video-india-vs...
try another link for the Clark catch this one won't work anymore
by kiwicric.. » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:35:45
> > > The ball from Lateef actually dropped out of his hands to the ground and
> > > he picked it up, at no stage did that happen with either Clarke or
> > > Ponting.
> > The law makes no distinction between a ball dropped to the ground and
> > picked up and a ball grounded in the act of catching. ?Both are not
> > catches. ?You have to really try harder and come up with a better
> > response.
> The law makes a distinction between appealing when you clearly know you
> haven't taken a catch, and appealing when you think you might have. ?One
> is a penalisable offence and the other isn't. ?You have to really try
> harder and come up with a better argument.
> GM
> PS. The All Blacks are chokers.
Just ask yourself: On the face of it, do you honestly believe Clarke
did not know the ball touched the ground? I mean he used the ball to
get up! You think no one else fielding around him noticed this? Why
do you think the replay focuses more on this portion? You have got to
be kidding me if your claim is that Clarke did not know that the ball
touched the ground. The guy claimed to be***-sure that he had
caught the ball clean when we know he had not, when Saurav Ganguly
knew he had not, and in spite of the evidence you want us to take his
word on it? How does the MR or umpire even know what Clarke knows or
does not know until an inquiry is held?
What about the case two weeks back against NZ in the one-day game off
Hopkins? That was clear cut as any. In many people's opinion, Clarke
is a suspect when it comes to catches -- serial offenders don't
deserve any benefit of doubt.
By now you should also know that many similar cases had cheating
charges successfully placed on them, and I don't see a reason why this
should be any different.
You can try and pull over some people's eyes, but the world is
watching. In any case, the least Ponting can do is to sincerely
apologize for claiming both the catches when they did not carry, even
if he claims that he was not aware at the time they were taken the
ball had been grounded. What did he do? He claims the ball was not
grounded even though the evidence is to the contrary and took off on a
reporter who suggested that his claim was off a grounded ball -- why?
Guilt? What is this guy's credibility now? Why should the world
believe him?
I can hear a chorus of exhortions from the Aussie nettors demanding an
apology from Ponting. NOT!!
by Geoff Muldoo » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:08:23
> > > > The ball from Lateef actually dropped out of his hands to the ground and
> > > > he picked it up, at no stage did that happen with either Clarke or
> > > > Ponting.
> > > The law makes no distinction between a ball dropped to the ground and
> > > picked up and a ball grounded in the act of catching. ?Both are not
> > > catches. ?You have to really try harder and come up with a better
> > > response.
> > The law makes a distinction between appealing when you clearly know you
> > haven't taken a catch, and appealing when you think you might have. ?One
> > is a penalisable offence and the other isn't. ?You have to really try
> > harder and come up with a better argument.
> > GM
> > PS. The All Blacks are chokers.
> Exactly, except that you are missing the point of what is being said.
> The initial claim made by the Aussie nettors was that it was a clean
> catch, now we have conclusively shown both subject were not "clean".
> Just ask yourself: On the face of it, do you honestly believe Clarke
> did not know the ball touched the ground?
GM
by R. Shake » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:45:07
I thought it was funny how Kumble referred to Clarke*** around
after hitting it to slip, but Ishant Sharma did the exact same on the
final delivery of the game. That IS a short memory.
by Ian Galbrait » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:06:39
[snip]
--
"She made me feel like a human being. That's not the kind of thing you
just forgive." - Angel, Buffy The Vampire Slayer
by Ian Galbrait » Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:06:44
[snip]
[snip]
--
"We not run out of time. There is infinite time. You are finite, Zathras
is finite. This...... is wrong tool." - Zathras, Babylon5
1. HUMILIATION AT ITS BEST """BANGLADESHI STYLE""""
2. Thanks God, Mr. "I am the one with the MOST sportsman spirit" Gilchrist
3. Sachin is "one of the best", not "the best", why argue?
4. "Favours" and "dis-Favours" for Zim
5. "Sledging" and "Excessive Appealing"
6. LARA: "...greatest cricketing moment of my life," "Nothing surpasses this."
8. "utterly soulless" n "relentlessly boring" Jacques Kallis speaks out
9. Australian Malcom "The Pig" Speed defends Darel "The Asshole" Hair
10. Niranjan Shah To Decide If Dravid Was "Rested" Or "Dropped"
11. "Deep down" "In their hearts"...
12. Sanjay's "cultured" and "civilized" comments.....