Murray: not convincing yet on grass

Murray: not convincing yet on grass

Post by WAY2GOO » Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:20:08


I still think he'll win a couple Wimbys, but he isn't
as great yet on grass as he is on the hard-courts
(Rafa spanked him last year at Wimbledon).

At times he looked anemic against Roddick today.

Maybe in a year or two he'll make the breakthrough.

 
 
 

Murray: not convincing yet on grass

Post by Darn Good Intelligenc » Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:21:02


Quote:
> I still think he'll win a couple Wimbys, but he isn't
> as great yet on grass as he is on the hard-courts
> (Rafa spanked him last year at Wimbledon).

> At times he looked anemic against Roddick today.

> Maybe in a year or two he'll make the breakthrough.

I agree and I think his first slam is more likely to be at the USO
than here.

 
 
 

Murray: not convincing yet on grass

Post by ahonka » Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:27:43


Quote:
> I still think he'll win a couple Wimbys, but he isn't
> as great yet on grass as he is on the hard-courts
> (Rafa spanked him last year at Wimbledon).

> At times he looked anemic against Roddick today.

> Maybe in a year or two he'll make the breakthrough.

    They showed some stats on age of major players
    when they won their first slam. Murray seems to
    be a late bloomer. Practically every good player
    had won a slam by the age of 22.

 
 
 

Murray: not convincing yet on grass

Post by Tanking a se » Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:45:51


Quote:
> I still think he'll win a couple Wimbys, but he isn't
> as great yet on grass as he is on the hard-courts
> (Rafa spanked him last year at Wimbledon).

> At times he looked anemic against Roddick today.

> Maybe in a year or two he'll make the breakthrough.

murray does not look convincing at the slams. all the slams.... he may
be good in bo3 but bo5, nope....
 
 
 

Murray: not convincing yet on grass

Post by Tanking a se » Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:46:30


Quote:

> > I still think he'll win a couple Wimbys, but he isn't
> > as great yet on grass as he is on the hard-courts
> > (Rafa spanked him last year at Wimbledon).

> > At times he looked anemic against Roddick today.

> > Maybe in a year or two he'll make the breakthrough.

> ? ? They showed some stats on age of major players
> ? ? when they won their first slam. Murray seems to
> ? ? be a late bloomer. Practically every good player
> ? ? had won a slam by the age of 22.

he will never win a slam.
 
 
 

Murray: not convincing yet on grass

Post by Superdav » Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:48:26

Quote:

>I still think he'll win a couple Wimbys, but he isn't
>as great yet on grass as he is on the hard-courts
>(Rafa spanked him last year at Wimbledon).

>At times he looked anemic against Roddick today.

>Maybe in a year or two he'll make the breakthrough.

ho humm. what else have i already not said already that you want to
get off your mind ?
 
 
 

Murray: not convincing yet on grass

Post by ulys.. » Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:54:19

Lendl didn't win a slam till he was 24 and eventually won 8.

Having said that, Murray isn't remotely the player Lendl was. He
crumpled under the pressure today. So be it.