Sport Today

>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is dedicated to.
>>>>>> Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>> duh?

>> it depends if I signed a NDA.

>> if not and they fired me i would sue their ass to high heaven.

>You don't need to have signed an NDA to not be allowed to take a
>company's information and expose it.

>>>> On Dec 17, 12:34 am, Inglourious Basterd

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is
>>>>>>>>>>>> dedicated to. Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>>>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>>>>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>>>>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>>>>>>> Assange works for no one so his employment is not the issue. If a court has
>>>>>>>> found that information is not goods then that's about it really.

>>>>>>> this extradiction is *nothing* to do with Wikileaks, it's about him
>>>>>>> ***ly ***ing 2 women. Problem is the chief Swedish prosecutor
>>>>>>> dropped the case in September, BUT it was re-opened 2 weeks ago, after
>>>>>>> pressure from a Swedish politician following Wikileaks' release ie.
>>>>>>> it's really corrupt political oppression.

>>>>>> yeas. and now it is the british who are KEEPING him in jail after he was ordered released on bail.

>>>>>> the swedes say they had nothing to do with that.

>>>>>> the long ***ing arm of the CIA again ?

>>>>>> history shows the world is better off without those freedom ***ing***aroaches!

>>>>> Certainly the CIA or some other arm of the US government is behind
>>>>> this. No coincidence that Assange happens to be accused again by
>>>>> Sweden, which happens to have an extradition treaty with the US,
>>>>> shortly after the US documents were leaked.-

>>>> Just take a look at him. He lokks like a nancyboy. He could not***
>>>> anyone, especially TWO women.
>>>> Something is very funny about this case. I do not trust him or those
>>>> who are after him. I do not trust anyone.

>>> What if they discover he is impotent or even a Eunuch or God forbid a raving ***!

>> You mean he is a gay?

> He looks gay to me.

>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is dedicated to.
>>>>>> Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>> duh?

>> it depends if I signed a NDA.

>> if not and they fired me i would sue their ass to high heaven.

>You don't need to have signed an NDA to not be allowed to take a
>company's information and expose it.

>>>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is
>>>>>>>>> dedicated to. Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>>>> Assange works for no one so his employment is not the issue. If a
>>>>> court has
>>>>> found that information is not goods then that's about it really.

>>>> Employer was just an example. The point is, the information he posted on
>>>> the internet was stolen (not by him, but that doesn't matter) from the
>>>> government. Or are you saying the government offered them (most is even
>>>> classified) to the people? The information was obtained ILLIGALLY
>>>> (regardless of what information it is)!

>>> ILLIGALLY, yes!

>> And what is your opinion if it was meant "ILLEGALLY"?

> WikiLeaks is set up to provide the "leaker" of documents complete anonymity. Assange denied that he encouraged Manning
> to send the documents and likened his role to that of a reporter who discovers information.

> "Security officers have a job to keep things secret, the press has the job to expose the public to the truth. So that is
> our job. We're doing it. The fact that state department was not able to do their job is a matter for them," he said.

>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is
>>>>>>> dedicated to. Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>> Assange works for no one so his employment is not the issue. If a court has
>>> found that information is not goods then that's about it really.

>> You cannot just steal goods, you can also steal information. And
>> stealing is illegal.

> Wilileaks "stole" nothing.

>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is dedicated to.
>>>>>>> Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>> duh?

>>> it depends if I signed a NDA.

>>> if not and they fired me i would sue their ass to high heaven.

>> You don't need to have signed an NDA to not be allowed to take a
>> company's information and expose it.

> Oh so now it is illegal to expose company information that you had
> no idea as to it being allowed or not being allowed? If you are NOT
> told it is not allowed how is it not allowed? By osmosis?

>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is dedicated to.
>>>>>>> Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>> duh?

>>> it depends if I signed a NDA.

>>> if not and they fired me i would sue their ass to high heaven.

>> You don't need to have signed an NDA to not be allowed to take a
>> company's information and expose it.

> Oh so the laws protecting whistle blowers are nonsense then? I see I see.

> >> > >> >>>>> Fry Assange!

> >> > >> >>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is
> >> > >> >>>> dedicated to. Julian Assange would approve of this post.

> >> > >> >>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

> >> > >> >> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

> >> > >> > If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
> >> > >> > that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

> >> > >> Assange works for no one so his employment is not the issue. If a court has
> >> > >> found that information is not goods then that's about it really.

> >> > >this extradiction is *nothing* to do with Wikileaks, it's about him
> >> > >***ly ***ing 2 women. Problem is the chief Swedish prosecutor
> >> > >dropped the case in September, BUT it was re-opened 2 weeks ago, after
> >> > >pressure from a Swedish politician following Wikileaks' release ie.
> >> > >it's really corrupt political oppression.

> >> > yeas. and now it is the british who are KEEPING him in jail after he was ordered released on bail.

> >> > the swedes say they had nothing to do with that.

> >> > the long ***ing arm of the CIA again ?

> >> > history shows the world is better off without those freedom ***ing***aroaches!

> >> Certainly the CIA or some other arm of the US government is behind
> >> this. No coincidence that Assange happens to be accused again by
> >> Sweden, which happens to have an extradition treaty with the US,
> >> shortly after the US documents were leaked.-

> >Just take a look at him. He lokks like a nancyboy. He could not***
> >anyone, especially TWO women.
> >Something is very funny about this case. I do not trust him or those
> >who are after him. I do not trust anyone.

> What if they discover he is impotent or even a Eunuch or God forbid a raving ***!-

>>>>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is
>>>>>>>>>> dedicated to. Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>>>>> Assange works for no one so his employment is not the issue. If a
>>>>>> court has
>>>>>> found that information is not goods then that's about it really.

>>>>> Employer was just an example. The point is, the information he posted on
>>>>> the internet was stolen (not by him, but that doesn't matter) from the
>>>>> government. Or are you saying the government offered them (most is even
>>>>> classified) to the people? The information was obtained ILLIGALLY
>>>>> (regardless of what information it is)!

>>>> ILLIGALLY, yes!

>>> And what is your opinion if it was meant "ILLEGALLY"?

>> WikiLeaks is set up to provide the "leaker" of documents complete anonymity. Assange denied that he encouraged Manning
>> to send the documents and likened his role to that of a reporter who discovers information.

>> "Security officers have a job to keep things secret, the press has the job to expose the public to the truth. So that is
>> our job. We're doing it. The fact that state department was not able to do their job is a matter for them," he said.

>Well, if the "things" were stolen, then they are not allowed to be
>passed on ...

>>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is
>>>>>>>> dedicated to. Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>>> Assange works for no one so his employment is not the issue. If a court has
>>>> found that information is not goods then that's about it really.

>>> You cannot just steal goods, you can also steal information. And
>>> stealing is illegal.

>> Wilileaks "stole" nothing.

>Nobody says Wikileaks stole something ... They just deal in stolen goods.

>>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is dedicated to.
>>>>>>>> Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>>> duh?

>>>> it depends if I signed a NDA.

>>>> if not and they fired me i would sue their ass to high heaven.

>>> You don't need to have signed an NDA to not be allowed to take a
>>> company's information and expose it.

>> Oh so now it is illegal to expose company information that you had
>> no idea as to it being allowed or not being allowed? If you are NOT
>> told it is not allowed how is it not allowed? By osmosis?

>You think the information is allowed to be exposed while they are
>classified? Time to go to bed, Dave.

>>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is dedicated to.
>>>>>>>> Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>>> duh?

>>>> it depends if I signed a NDA.

>>>> if not and they fired me i would sue their ass to high heaven.

>>> You don't need to have signed an NDA to not be allowed to take a
>>> company's information and expose it.

>> Oh so the laws protecting whistle blowers are nonsense then? I see I see.

>Which laws protect whistle blowers?

>>>>>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is
>>>>>>>>>>> dedicated to. Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>>>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>>>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>>>>>> Assange works for no one so his employment is not the issue. If a
>>>>>>> court has
>>>>>>> found that information is not goods then that's about it really.

>>>>>> Employer was just an example. The point is, the information he posted on
>>>>>> the internet was stolen (not by him, but that doesn't matter) from the
>>>>>> government. Or are you saying the government offered them (most is even
>>>>>> classified) to the people? The information was obtained ILLIGALLY
>>>>>> (regardless of what information it is)!

>>>>> ILLIGALLY, yes!

>>>> And what is your opinion if it was meant "ILLEGALLY"?

>>> WikiLeaks is set up to provide the "leaker" of documents complete anonymity. Assange denied that he encouraged Manning
>>> to send the documents and likened his role to that of a reporter who discovers information.

>>> "Security officers have a job to keep things secret, the press has the job to expose the public to the truth. So that is
>>> our job. We're doing it. The fact that state department was not able to do their job is a matter for them," he said.

>> Well, if the "things" were stolen, then they are not allowed to be
>> passed on ...

> Nothing was stolen we settled that already. Call the defense department and ask them if anything is missing?

> The answer is NO.

>>>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is
>>>>>>>>> dedicated to. Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>>>> Assange works for no one so his employment is not the issue. If a court has
>>>>> found that information is not goods then that's about it really.

>>>> You cannot just steal goods, you can also steal information. And
>>>> stealing is illegal.

>>> Wilileaks "stole" nothing.

>> Nobody says Wikileaks stole something ... They just deal in stolen goods.

> No. They deal in the dissemination of Public information much like the NYT did with
> the Pentagon Papers. That was ruled to not be illegal. So is this not illegal although
> they will make up something to try and say it is illegal and perhaps even pass new
> laws and try and enforce them retrospectively but that is a mighty slippery slope
> that is more than halfway to destroying all democracy. If that happens every
> country in the world will be passing laws and demanding the USA extradite all their
> dissidents who we have been protecting for decades. What will happen then?
> Selective application when the USA wants somebody by none when somebody else
> wants somebody?

> Don't be an ***.

> The only way they are going to get rid of Assange is by assassination. Now that is
> a real possibility.

>>>>>>>>>> Fry Assange!

>>>>>>>>> People speaking honestly and openly. This is what Assange is dedicated to.
>>>>>>>>> Julian Assange would approve of this post.

>>>>>>>> I thought he is dealing in stolen goods which is illegal?

>>>>>>> No. Information is not "goods". The Daniel Ellsberg trial said so.

>>>>>> If you steals information from your employer like that and they know
>>>>>> that, would they fire you or can you say information is not goods?

>>>>> duh?

>>>>> it depends if I signed a NDA.

>>>>> if not and they fired me i would sue their ass to high heaven.

>>>> You don't need to have signed an NDA to not be allowed to take a
>>>> company's information and expose it.

>>> Oh so now it is illegal to expose company information that you had
>>> no idea as to it being allowed or not being allowed? If you are NOT
>>> told it is not allowed how is it not allowed? By osmosis?

>> You think the information is allowed to be exposed while they are
>> classified? Time to go to bed, Dave.

> who says it is classified? how do you really now it is legit? anyway even classified information is public property. it
> is the responsibility of whoever classifies it to keep it private. if they can't, too ***ing bad cause that is NOT a
> crime.