14-14 would be ridiculous in a tiebreaker...

14-14 would be ridiculous in a tiebreaker...

Post by Archange » Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:22:07


much less in games.

What a match.

Tops last year's final, in my opinion. This is one that American tennis has
needed badly on the men's side.

 
 
 

14-14 would be ridiculous in a tiebreaker...

Post by Scot » Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:23:11


Quote:
> much less in games.

> What a match.

> Tops last year's final, in my opinion. This is one that American tennis has
> needed badly on the men's side.

quality is much less than last year.  it's only tense because Roger
isn't playing his best.

 
 
 

14-14 would be ridiculous in a tiebreaker...

Post by bob » Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:29:58



Quote:
> much less in games.

> What a match.

> Tops last year's final, in my opinion. This is one that American tennis
> has
> needed badly on the men's side.
>quality is much less than last year.  it's only tense because Roger

isn't playing his best.

roger's playing as well as he can given the way roddick is LETTING him play.
after match rog said he played his very best tennis or else wouldn't have
won.

bob

 
 
 

14-14 would be ridiculous in a tiebreaker...

Post by TennisGu » Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:11:41


Quote:

> > much less in games.

> > What a match.

> > Tops last year's final, in my opinion. This is one that American tennis has
> > needed badly on the men's side.

> quality is much less than last year. ?it's only tense because Roger
> isn't playing his best.

 I would agree with you here.