He'll be the 3rd guy to complete a career slam within a 3 yr span (Fed
'09 FO, Rafa '10 USO). Before that it happened only once in 40 years.
What does that tell us about quality of players in this era, & the
surfaces the game is played on?
He'll be the 3rd guy to complete a career slam within a 3 yr span (Fed
'09 FO, Rafa '10 USO). Before that it happened only once in 40 years.
What does that tell us about quality of players in this era, & the
surfaces the game is played on?
> What does that tell us about quality of players in this era, & the
> surfaces the game is played on?
> What does that tell us about quality of players in this era, & the
> surfaces the game is played on?
> What does that tell us about quality of players in this era, & the
> surfaces the game is played on?
But yes, it does tell us something about the homogenization of
surfaces. This slowing down of surfaces is hurting variety in the game.
>He'll be the 3rd guy to complete a career slam within a 3 yr span (Fed
>'09 FO, Rafa '10 USO). Before that it happened only once in 40 years.
>What does that tell us about quality of players in this era, & the
>surfaces the game is played on?
>> What does that tell us about quality of players in this era,& the
>> surfaces the game is played on?
> nothing really, expected development
>> What does that tell us about quality of players in this era,& the
>> surfaces the game is played on?
> unless you keep on predicting his losses again like in this USO , that
> would
> make it quiet meaningful though.
> What does that tell us about quality of players in this era, & the
> surfaces the game is played on?
> He'll be the 3rd guy to complete a career slam within a 3 yr span (Fed
> '09 FO, Rafa '10 USO). Before that it happened only once in 40 years.
Perry+Budge 30's
Laver+Emerson 60's
Agassi 90's
Fed+Nad 00's
And Djokovic has not won FO yet! If he does it beating Nadal at FO his
career slam is well deserved.
> What does that tell us about quality of players in this era, & the
> surfaces the game is played on?
>>> What does that tell us about quality of players in this era,& the
>>> surfaces the game is played on?
>> unless you keep on predicting his losses again like in this USO , that
>> would
>> make it quiet meaningful though.
> I predicted Fed would beat Djoker. Are you saying that was a poor analysis?
>> He'll be the 3rd guy to complete a career slam within a 3 yr span (Fed
>> '09 FO, Rafa '10 USO). Before that it happened only once in 40 years.
> Incorrect.
> Perry+Budge 30's
> Laver+Emerson 60's
> Agassi 90's
> Fed+Nad 00's
>>> He'll be the 3rd guy to complete a career slam within a 3 yr span (Fed
>>> '09 FO, Rafa '10 USO). Before that it happened only once in 40 years.
>> Incorrect.
>> Perry+Budge 30's
>> Laver+Emerson 60's
>> Agassi 90's
>> Fed+Nad 00's
> Before Fed won it in 2009 it only happened once before in previous 40
> yrs. Now 3 times in 3 yrs looks likely.
Crawford, Trabert, Hoad, Cooper, Connors, Wilander...Wilding?
>>> He'll be the 3rd guy to complete a career slam within a 3 yr span (Fed
>>> '09 FO, Rafa '10 USO). Before that it happened only once in 40 years.
>> Incorrect.
>> Perry+Budge 30's
>> Laver+Emerson 60's
>> Agassi 90's
>> Fed+Nad 00's
> Before Fed won it in 2009 it only happened once before in previous 40
> yrs.
> >> 13.9.2011 13:27, Whisper kirjoitti:
> >>> He'll be the 3rd guy to complete a career slam within a 3 yr span (Fed
> >>> '09 FO, Rafa '10 USO). Before that it happened only once in 40 years.
> >> Incorrect.
> >> Perry+Budge 30's
> >> Laver+Emerson 60's
> >> Agassi 90's
> >> Fed+Nad 00's
> > Before Fed won it in 2009 it only happened once before in previous 40
> > yrs. Now 3 times in 3 yrs looks likely.
> Why not just admit you were wrong...there are above pairs that have made it.
> And some have been very close...winning 3 slams in one year, in addition
> to names above:
> Crawford, Trabert, Hoad, Cooper, Connors, Wilander...Wilding?
Other than Agassi, the others missed the boat. Came agonizingly close,
at times.
> What does that tell us about quality of players in this era, & the
> surfaces the game is played on?
Slowing the grass down at Wimbledon has helped the claycourters
compete on this
surface. It hasn't changed the dynamic at the top of the game.
1. French Open 2012: Don’t Underestimate Roger Federer’s Chances to Win French Open
2. Men's Tennis: Why Novak Djokovic Will Win the 2012 Australian Open
3. How many slams will Djokovic win in 2012?
4. Djokovic to win the CYGS in 2012
5. Australian Open 2012 Results: How Djokovic Will Continue Streak vs. Nadal
6. Australian Open 2012: Why Rafael Nadal Will Again Fall to Novak Djokovic
7. French Open 2012: 12 Bold Predictions for the Next Grand Slam
8. ESPN French Open 2012 Expert Predictions
9. Guest Column: Grading 2012 French Open TV Coverage
10. Australian Open 2012: Andy Murray Doesn't Stand a Chance vs. Novak Djokovic
11. Roger Federer: US Open 2012 Win Would Be Most Impressive Title of Epic Career
12. Djokovic - Fed's Solution to win the French Open...
13. Djokovic in 2012: Years after great years
14. 2012 Djokovic's defining year