Both guy's can't return for shit

Both guy's can't return for shit

Post by only hum » Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:00:13


I think Isner is going to lose by getting too tired

 
 
 

Both guy's can't return for shit

Post by Javier González Nicolin » Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:14:03


Quote:
> I think Isner is going to lose by getting too tired

After 5.5 hours serving nonstop? You bet your ass they can't do shit.

 
 
 

Both guy's can't return for shit

Post by jdeluis » Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:15:58

On 23-Jun-2010, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Javier_Gonz=E1lez_Nicolini?=

Quote:


> > I think Isner is going to lose by getting too tired

> After 5.5 hours serving nonstop? You bet your ass they can't do shit.

This one match could really hold up the tournament.  What happens if they're
still playing the match in a few days? :)

 
 
 

Both guy's can't return for shit

Post by Javier González Nicolin » Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:17:39


Quote:
> On 23-Jun-2010, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Javier_Gonz=E1lez_Nicolini?=



> > > I think Isner is going to lose by getting too tired

> > After 5.5 hours serving nonstop? You bet your ass they can't do shit.

> This one match could really hold up the tournament. ?What happens if they're
> still playing the match in a few days? :)

The other side of the draw has already picked a finalist, and they get
stuck in the QFs of this side of the draw because this quarter is
still pending. XD
 
 
 

Both guy's can't return for shit

Post by ed scheuer » Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:30:02


Quote:
> On 23-Jun-2010, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Javier_Gonz=E1lez_Nicolini?=



> > > I think Isner is going to lose by getting too tired

> > After 5.5 hours serving nonstop? You bet your ass they can't do shit.

> This one match could really hold up the tournament. ?What happens if they're
> still playing the match in a few days? :)

With the serve-to-return ratio it's basically become tic-tac-toe;
nobody wins.  My real worry is that it holds up the tournament, as you
mention.  I've got tickets for the 2nd Monday (4th round) and I don't
want the whateverth day of Isner-Mahut being the only men's match
available :-)
 
 
 

Both guy's can't return for shit

Post by ed scheuer » Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:36:38



Quote:

> > On 23-Jun-2010, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Javier_Gonz=E1lez_Nicolini?=



> > > > I think Isner is going to lose by getting too tired

> > > After 5.5 hours serving nonstop? You bet your ass they can't do shit.

> > This one match could really hold up the tournament. ?What happens if they're
> > still playing the match in a few days? :)

> The other side of the draw has already picked a finalist, and they get
> stuck in the QFs of this side of the draw because this quarter is
> still pending. XD

I like Djokovic's idea of the mutually agreed upon tiebreak at 50 all
fifth set.
 
 
 

Both guy's can't return for shit

Post by jdeluis » Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:39:39


Quote:



> > > On 23-Jun-2010, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Javier_Gonz=E1lez_Nicolini?=



> > > > > I think Isner is going to lose by getting too tired

> > > > After 5.5 hours serving nonstop? You bet your ass they can't do
> > > > shit.

> > > This one match could really hold up the tournament. ?What happens if
> > > they're
> > > still playing the match in a few days? :)

> > The other side of the draw has already picked a finalist, and they get
> > stuck in the QFs of this side of the draw because this quarter is
> > still pending. XD

> I like Djokovic's idea of the mutually agreed upon tiebreak at 50 all
> fifth set.

Well, they could play the tiebreaker for a few days too:)