Sport Today

> 1) Led Zeppelin
> 2) Yes
> 3) Pink Floyd
> 4) Rush
> 5) AC/DC
> 6) Black Sabbath
> 7) Deep Purple
> 8) The Who
> 9) Metallica
> 10)Aerosmith

> > What are your thoughts on this list? Remember that I am including the
> > progressive hard rock bands also. Note that not all progressive rock
> > bands are progressive hard rock (ELP, Genesis, Gentle Giant have much
> > softer music than Floyd, Yes, Queensryche, Dream Theater, Rush etc)

> > 1) Led Zeppelin
> > 2) Yes
> > 3) Pink Floyd
> > 4) Rush
> > 5) AC/DC
> > 6) Black Sabbath
> > 7) Deep Purple
> > 8) The Who
> > 9) Metallica
> > 10)Aerosmith

> What's your ultimate fantasy - lead singer with Pink Floyd, or getting
> ******ed by Lendl?

>>>What are your thoughts on this list? Remember that I am including the
>>>progressive hard rock bands also. Note that not all progressive rock
>>>bands are progressive hard rock (ELP, Genesis, Gentle Giant have much
>>>softer music than Floyd, Yes, Queensryche, Dream Theater, Rush etc)

>>>1) Led Zeppelin
>>>2) Yes
>>>3) Pink Floyd
>>>4) Rush
>>>5) AC/DC
>>>6) Black Sabbath
>>>7) Deep Purple
>>>8) The Who
>>>9) Metallica
>>>10)Aerosmith

>>What's your ultimate fantasy - lead singer with Pink Floyd, or getting
>>******ed by Lendl?

> Why do you continue to prove that you are a jackass? We know it already

> >>>What are your thoughts on this list? Remember that I am including the
> >>>progressive hard rock bands also. Note that not all progressive rock
> >>>bands are progressive hard rock (ELP, Genesis, Gentle Giant have much
> >>>softer music than Floyd, Yes, Queensryche, Dream Theater, Rush etc)

> >>>1) Led Zeppelin
> >>>2) Yes
> >>>3) Pink Floyd
> >>>4) Rush
> >>>5) AC/DC
> >>>6) Black Sabbath
> >>>7) Deep Purple
> >>>8) The Who
> >>>9) Metallica
> >>>10)Aerosmith

> >>What's your ultimate fantasy - lead singer with Pink Floyd, or getting
> >>******ed by Lendl?

> > Why do you continue to prove that you are a jackass? We know it already

> Just answer the question.

> Honestly.

> > What are your thoughts on this list? Remember that I am including the
> > progressive hard rock bands also. Note that not all progressive rock
> > bands are progressive hard rock (ELP, Genesis, Gentle Giant have much
> > softer music than Floyd, Yes, Queensryche, Dream Theater, Rush etc)

> > 1) Led Zeppelin
> > 2) Yes
> > 3) Pink Floyd
> > 4) Rush
> > 5) AC/DC
> > 6) Black Sabbath
> > 7) Deep Purple
> > 8) The Who
> > 9) Metallica
> > 10)Aerosmith

> What's your ultimate fantasy - lead singer with Pink Floyd, or getting
> ******ed by Lendl?

> > Is it true that Lendl is hung like a pistachio?  He has like 5 girls or
> > something, so that implies he doesn't get much depth--at least
> > according to studies I have seen.

> What studies?

> > > Is it true that Lendl is hung like a pistachio?  He has like 5 girls or
> > > something, so that implies he doesn't get much depth--at least
> > > according to studies I have seen.

> > What studies?

> I read somewhere that depth is good for producing boys, something about
> the X-***s tending to run deep and that dog position was optimal for
> achieving that--provided you push those ass cheeks up real well.

> > > > Is it true that Lendl is hung like a pistachio?  He has like 5 girls or
> > > > something, so that implies he doesn't get much depth--at least
> > > > according to studies I have seen.

> > > What studies?

> > I read somewhere that depth is good for producing boys, something about
> > the X-***s tending to run deep and that dog position was optimal for
> > achieving that--provided you push those ass cheeks up real well.

> Geez, now I've heard everything.  By the way, it would be *** cells
> with the Y sex chromosome.  XX = girl, XY = boy.

>>>>Is it true that Lendl is hung like a pistachio?  He has like 5 girls or
>>>>something, so that implies he doesn't get much depth--at least
>>>>according to studies I have seen.

>>>What studies?

>>I read somewhere that depth is good for producing boys, something about
>>the X-***s tending to run deep and that dog position was optimal for
>>achieving that--provided you push those ass cheeks up real well.

> Geez, now I've heard everything.  By the way, it would be *** cells
> with the Y sex chromosome.  XX = girl, XY = boy.

> >>>>Is it true that Lendl is hung like a pistachio?  He has like 5 girls or
> >>>>something, so that implies he doesn't get much depth--at least
> >>>>according to studies I have seen.

> >>>What studies?

> >>I read somewhere that depth is good for producing boys, something about
> >>the X-***s tending to run deep and that dog position was optimal for
> >>achieving that--provided you push those ass cheeks up real well.

> > Geez, now I've heard everything.  By the way, it would be *** cells
> > with the Y sex chromosome.  XX = girl, XY = boy.

> YY = Raja.

>>>Geez, now I've heard everything.  By the way, it would be *** cells
>>>with the Y sex chromosome.  XX = girl, XY = boy.

>>YY = Raja.

> YY doesn't happen but YYX does.