Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by TT » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:15:41


What Fedfans don't seem to understand that Djoker's domination is making
mockery of Fedal era.

Now Nadal always dominated Fed, while Djokovic dominates now Nadal AND
everyone else as well. I was correct in saying few years ago that
Djokovic in fact is ten times better than Fed ever was or will be. Now
that he's gotten over his mental/physical issues it appears I was correct.

Now Fedfans are trying to pretend it's a matchup issue... hard to see
how Djokovic's domination would be a matchup issue while he's beating
everyone and winning everything in sight.

The negative point for Nadal fans will be of course Nadal winning less
tournaments and losing GOAT claims of his own. But then again us Nadal
fans never pretended make believe.
And of course there's a chance that Nadal will turn it around which will
only amount to NADAL's greatness... while Fed never will turn it around
against Nadal...and probably will have a losing h2h against Djokovic as
well, end of their careers. Oh and Murray of course.

Now when it comes to Nadal's clay GOAT claims - they're perfectly safe,
Borg quit at 26 which gives him no advantage over Nadal.

 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by Joe Ramire » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:20:49


Quote:
> I was correct in saying few years ago that
> Djokovic in fact is ten times better than Fed ever was or will be.

This kind of ***invalidates the entire post.

You can either try to post rational tennis analysis, or you can take
delight in posting inflammatory rhetoric. You can't do both.

 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by ca1hou » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:41:57


Quote:
> What Fedfans don't seem to understand that Djoker's domination is making
> mockery of Fedal era.

> Now Nadal always dominated Fed, while Djokovic dominates now Nadal AND
> everyone else as well. I was correct in saying few years ago that
> Djokovic in fact is ten times better than Fed ever was or will be. Now
> that he's gotten over his mental/physical issues it appears I was correct.

> Now Fedfans are trying to pretend it's a matchup issue... hard to see
> how Djokovic's domination would be a matchup issue while he's beating
> everyone and winning everything in sight.

> The negative point for Nadal fans will be of course Nadal winning less
> tournaments and losing GOAT claims of his own. But then again us Nadal
> fans never pretended make believe.
> And of course there's a chance that Nadal will turn it around which will
> only amount to NADAL's greatness... while Fed never will turn it around
> against Nadal...and probably will have a losing h2h against Djokovic as
> well, end of their careers. Oh and Murray of course.

> Now when it comes to Nadal's clay GOAT claims - they're perfectly safe,
> Borg quit at 26 which gives him no advantage over Nadal.

Is this the way you make yourself feel better after a Nadal loss?  It
sound like your trying to justify why Novak is *** Nadal ass at
every event. Basically since Novak is "ten time better than Federer
was" it OK that Nadal can't beat him.  However if Novak is :ten time
better than Federer" how is it that Federer manages to be so
competitive toward him.  Their match should be more one-sided
correct.  In fact, if Federer is such a hack why is it even a big deal
when they beat him?

Novak is playing great and Federer unfortunately is older and can't go
back in time so it ok, Roger fans are quite happy with Federer career
result so far lol. Let see how long Novak can last, Nadal only
dominate for a year partly because Federer keep the little ***pirate
at the number 2 spot for so long.

Nadal need 1 more France, which i think he will get but im not in the
business of counting my chickens before they hatch.  So we will wait
and see if the OCD boy pull it off this year.

Federer can have a losing career against players who are 5 years his
younger, I'm not sure how y'all spit Federer era.  One minute his era
is weak next minute his era include Nadal, Novak and Murray.  I would
like to know exactly how many slams wins does Federer have when
anything of these guy were in the draw.  Beacuse if they were in the
draw then it not Federer fault that they couldn't make it to the
finals.

 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by RahimAsi » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:44:20


Quote:
> What Fedfans don't seem to understand that Djoker's domination is making
> mockery of Fedal era.

> Now Nadal always dominated Fed, while Djokovic dominates now Nadal AND
> everyone else as well. I was correct in saying few years ago that
> Djokovic in fact is ten times better than Fed ever was or will be. Now
> that he's gotten over his mental/physical issues it appears I was correct.

> Now Fedfans are trying to pretend it's a matchup issue... hard to see
> how Djokovic's domination would be a matchup issue while he's beating
> everyone and winning everything in sight.

> The negative point for Nadal fans will be of course Nadal winning less
> tournaments and losing GOAT claims of his own. But then again us Nadal
> fans never pretended make believe.
> And of course there's a chance that Nadal will turn it around which will
> only amount to NADAL's greatness... while Fed never will turn it around
> against Nadal...and probably will have a losing h2h against Djokovic as
> well, end of their careers. Oh and Murray of course.

> Now when it comes to Nadal's clay GOAT claims - they're perfectly safe,
> Borg quit at 26 which gives him no advantage over Nadal.

I think the clear verdict is that the last year or so Djokovic has
simply been better than Nadal. In the same way, Nadal has simply been
better than Federer all throughout their careers. After seeing this
match, I have reason to believe that Nadal will turn it around against
Djoker. Not much hope for Fed though, he came on a 20+ match winning
streak, playing as well as he had in a very long time, not dropping a
single set in the tournament, and yet could only win just a solitary
set, that too a 7-6 squeaker...
 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by TT » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:12:51

31.1.2012 8:20, Joe Ramirez kirjoitti:

Quote:

>> I was correct in saying few years ago that
>> Djokovic in fact is ten times better than Fed ever was or will be.

> This kind of ***invalidates the entire post.

So you think he's only 9 times better?

Quote:
> You can either try to post rational tennis analysis, or you can take
> delight in posting inflammatory rhetoric. You can't do both.

In case you forgot, this is rst.
 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by TT » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:21:29

31.1.2012 8:44, RahimAsif kirjoitti:

Quote:

>> What Fedfans don't seem to understand that Djoker's domination is making
>> mockery of Fedal era.

>> Now Nadal always dominated Fed, while Djokovic dominates now Nadal AND
>> everyone else as well. I was correct in saying few years ago that
>> Djokovic in fact is ten times better than Fed ever was or will be. Now
>> that he's gotten over his mental/physical issues it appears I was correct.

>> Now Fedfans are trying to pretend it's a matchup issue... hard to see
>> how Djokovic's domination would be a matchup issue while he's beating
>> everyone and winning everything in sight.

>> The negative point for Nadal fans will be of course Nadal winning less
>> tournaments and losing GOAT claims of his own. But then again us Nadal
>> fans never pretended make believe.
>> And of course there's a chance that Nadal will turn it around which will
>> only amount to NADAL's greatness... while Fed never will turn it around
>> against Nadal...and probably will have a losing h2h against Djokovic as
>> well, end of their careers. Oh and Murray of course.

>> Now when it comes to Nadal's clay GOAT claims - they're perfectly safe,
>> Borg quit at 26 which gives him no advantage over Nadal.

> I think the clear verdict is that the last year or so Djokovic has
> simply been better than Nadal. In the same way, Nadal has simply been
> better than Federer all throughout their careers. After seeing this
> match, I have reason to believe that Nadal will turn it around against
> Djoker. Not much hope for Fed though, he came on a 20+ match winning
> streak, playing as well as he had in a very long time, not dropping a
> single set in the tournament, and yet could only win just a solitary
> set, that too a 7-6 squeaker...

Yes, and that without Nadal even bothering to exploit his bh...
 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by TT » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:27:31

31.1.2012 8:41, ca1houn kirjoitti:

Quote:
> how is it that Federer manages to be so
> competitive toward him.

He isn't, Murray has done best against Djokovic. Nadal was close as well
couple days ago.

Djokovic dominates currently everyone. In an era where top 2 dominates
like never before in history of tennis.

Now if Djokovic would win French against Nadal - he would be most
*** player in most competitive era ever...the only era same two
players made 4 consecutive slam finals.

 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by felange » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:17:51

Quote:
> He isn't, Murray has done best against Djokovic. Nadal was close as well
> couple days ago.

Wtf? Who is the only person to have beaten him in a slam since his run
began? Not really as grateful as you should be for that win...as we all know
what it likely would have meant....
 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by felange » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:19:22

AhhhhhHHHHHHHHHhhh!!! :D

I love the smell of bitter bitter seethage in the morning.

Troll on MacDuff!! :O)

 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by kaennorsin » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:20:59


Quote:

> > What Fedfans don't seem to understand that Djoker's domination is making
> > mockery of Fedal era.

> > Now Nadal always dominated Fed, while Djokovic dominates now Nadal AND
> > everyone else as well. I was correct in saying few years ago that
> > Djokovic in fact is ten times better than Fed ever was or will be. Now
> > that he's gotten over his mental/physical issues it appears I was correct.

> > Now Fedfans are trying to pretend it's a matchup issue... hard to see
> > how Djokovic's domination would be a matchup issue while he's beating
> > everyone and winning everything in sight.

> > The negative point for Nadal fans will be of course Nadal winning less
> > tournaments and losing GOAT claims of his own. But then again us Nadal
> > fans never pretended make believe.
> > And of course there's a chance that Nadal will turn it around which will
> > only amount to NADAL's greatness... while Fed never will turn it around
> > against Nadal...and probably will have a losing h2h against Djokovic as
> > well, end of their careers. Oh and Murray of course.

> > Now when it comes to Nadal's clay GOAT claims - they're perfectly safe,
> > Borg quit at 26 which gives him no advantage over Nadal.

> I think the clear verdict is that the last year or so Djokovic has
> simply been better than Nadal. In the same way, Nadal has simply been
> better than Federer all throughout their careers. After seeing this
> match, I have reason to believe that Nadal will turn it around against
> Djoker. Not much hope for Fed though, he came on a 20+ match winning
> streak, playing as well as he had in a very long time, not dropping a
> single set in the tournament, and yet could only win just a solitary
> set, that too a 7-6 squeaker...

You're being obtuse again. You're right that Djoker's been clearly
better than Rafa in the last year or so. Nadal however, was obviously
only better than Federer in the last couple of years (since 08), as
before that period he won less, lost more and dominated Fed only on
clay.
 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by Thomas R. Kettle » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:55:33


Quote:

> 31.1.2012 8:20, Joe Ramirez kirjoitti:

> >> I was correct in saying few years ago that
> >> Djokovic in fact is ten times better than Fed ever was or will be.

> > This kind of ***invalidates the entire post.

> So you think he's only 9 times better?

> > You can either try to post rational tennis analysis, or you can take
> > delight in posting inflammatory rhetoric. You can't do both.

> In case you forgot, this is rst.

You do realize this makes you a Whiner-49er?
--
Remove blown from email address to reply.
 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by Javier Gonzále » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:31:22


Quote:
> 31.1.2012 8:41, ca1houn kirjoitti:

> > how is it that Federer manages to be so
> > competitive toward him.

> He isn't, Murray has done best against Djokovic. Nadal was close as well
> couple days ago.

Since superDjoker era began (AO2011), top 2-4 against Djokovic:

Federer: 1 win (slam), 1 loss with match points (slam), 3 other losses
(1 slam, 1 TM1k, 1 MM).
Nadal: 7 losses (3 slam, 4 TM1k. No match points).
Murray: 1 win (djokovic retirement, TM1K), 3 losses (2 slam, 1 TM1K
with match point I think).

So how is it that Murray and Nadal are doing better than Federer
against Djokovic?

Quote:
> Djokovic dominates currently everyone.

True.

Quote:
> Now if Djokovic would win French against Nadal - he would be most
> *** player in most competitive era ever...the only era same two
> players made 4 consecutive slam finals.

Remind me again why didn't this happen last year?
 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by Professor » Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:50:03


Quote:

> > 31.1.2012 8:41, ca1houn kirjoitti:

> > > how is it that Federer manages to be so
> > > competitive toward him.

> > He isn't, Murray has done best against Djokovic. Nadal was close as well
> > couple days ago.

> Since superDjoker era began (AO2011), top 2-4 against Djokovic:

> Federer: 1 win (slam), 1 loss with match points (slam), 3 other losses
> (1 slam, 1 TM1k, 1 MM).
> Nadal: 7 losses (3 slam, 4 TM1k. No match points).
> Murray: 1 win (djokovic retirement, TM1K), 3 losses (2 slam, 1 TM1K
> with match point I think).

> So how is it that Murray and Nadal are doing better than Federer
> against Djokovic?

> > Djokovic dominates currently everyone.

> True.

> > Now if Djokovic would win French against Nadal - he would be most
> > *** player in most competitive era ever...the only era same two
> > players made 4 consecutive slam finals.

> Remind me again why didn't this happen last year?

Murray straight setted djokovic in cincy final, djoker pulled out just
because Muzz was about to bagel him. Nearly took Djok out at AO this
year had bpoints to serve for the match & muzz served for the match
against Djokovic in the Rome Semi Finals.

So every match Muzz played against Djokovic 2 Murray has nearly won or
won easily other than the AO Final.

 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by RzR » Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:48:12


Quote:
> What Fedfans don't seem to understand that Djoker's domination is making
> mockery of Fedal era.

> Now Nadal always dominated Fed, while Djokovic dominates now Nadal AND
> everyone else as well. I was correct in saying few years ago that
> Djokovic in fact is ten times better than Fed ever was or will be. Now
> that he's gotten over his mental/physical issues it appears I was correct.

> Now Fedfans are trying to pretend it's a matchup issue... hard to see
> how Djokovic's domination would be a matchup issue while he's beating
> everyone and winning everything in sight.

fed stopped him, and i dont know how he didnt do it twice...whats nadals
excuse?

Quote:
> The negative point for Nadal fans will be of course Nadal winning less
> tournaments and losing GOAT claims of his own. But then again us Nadal
> fans never pretended make believe.
> And of course there's a chance that Nadal will turn it around which will
> only amount to NADAL's greatness... while Fed never will turn it around
> against Nadal...and probably will have a losing h2h against Djokovic as
> well, end of their careers. Oh and Murray of course.

> Now when it comes to Nadal's clay GOAT claims - they're perfectly safe,
> Borg quit at 26 which gives him no advantage over Nadal.

hahaha

matchups mother***er, matchups

this strengthtens it even more that fed is a goat, anda that a stupid
H2H doesnt matter in that department

now we can have some h2h list to see who is best, but then nadal is
below davydenko ROTFL so lets not mention that one :D

 
 
 

Djoker's domination making mockery of Fed's GOAT claims

Post by RzR » Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:49:02


Quote:
> 31.1.2012 8:20, Joe Ramirez kirjoitti:

>>> I was correct in saying few years ago that
>>> Djokovic in fact is ten times better than Fed ever was or will be.

>> This kind of ***invalidates the entire post.

> So you think he's only 9 times better?

no fed is 3 and some times better...check the scoreboard