RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Dave Hazelwoo » Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:45:41


http://SportToday.org/

Every ***ing thing that comes out of washington dc is a LIE !!!

 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Calimer » Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:42:51


Quote:
> http://SportToday.org/

> Every ***ing thing that comes out of washington dc is a LIE !!!

I don't think RFK jr. is lying. He simply doesn't know better and
clings to *** theories.
Same as you clinging to your guns and the bible.

Max

 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by The Roadrunne » Tue, 15 Jan 2013 03:10:20


Quote:

> >http://SportToday.org/

> > Every ***ing thing that comes out of washington dc is a LIE !!!

> I don't think RFK jr. is lying. He simply doesn't know better

It was the USAG (his father) who had evidence revealing
others were involved, however the Warren Commission concluded
(after the body had been tampered with and witnesses mysteriously
died),
otherwise.

Quote:
> and
> clings to *** theories.
> Same as you clinging to your guns and the bible.

Didn't know you were into the occult.
(Maxine clicking her stilettos together doing the Heil Hitler salute.)

 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Calimer » Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:41:57


Quote:


> > >http://SportToday.org/

> > > Every ***ing thing that comes out of washington dc is a LIE !!!

> > I don't think RFK jr. is lying. He simply doesn't know better

> It was the USAG (his father) who had evidence revealing
> others were involved, however the Warren Commission concluded
> (after the body had been tampered with and witnesses mysteriously
> died),
> otherwise.

LOL, yet another *** creep here!
This "body tampering" has been debunked years ago. And which really
important witness "died mysteriously"?
There was a lot of debate in the years after the stabbing. But today -
thanks to modern forensic, acoustic and ballistic research those
questions have been answered. Every lawyer would agree that Oswald was
responsible, and he alone. The evidence is overwhelming. This is truly
a case closed.

Max

 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Breede » Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:02:50

. Every lawyer would agree that Oswald was

Quote:
> responsible, and he alone. The evidence is overwhelming. This is truly
> a case closed.

> Max

Perhaps true, Max--lawyers are an incredibly stupid bunch.
 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Calimer » Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:09:59


Quote:
> . Every lawyer would agree that Oswald was

> > responsible, and he alone. The evidence is overwhelming. This is truly
> > a case closed.

> > Max

> Perhaps true, Max--lawyers are an incredibly stupid bunch.

The are more intelligent than the average guy. But more important -
they have been educated to  apply logic.
The *** nutters have failed complete in giving a least a little
bit convincing narrative of the JFK assassination. We know enough
today about Oswald and his path on November 22nd, about Ruby and what
he did the same day, the gun, the bullets, the injuries, the
acoustics, the surgery, the transport to Washington, the autopsy to
conclude with almost 100 % certainty that Oswald killed Kennedy and
that he killed him alome.
But it is the same with 9/11 - there will always be losers who jump
onto every possibility of a ***. Because government is evil and
therefore responsible for their individual failure in life.
Hazey is a nice example. So are you.

Max

 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Dave Hazelwoo » Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:20:35

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 07:09:59 -0800 (PST), Calimero

Quote:


>> . Every lawyer would agree that Oswald was

>> > responsible, and he alone. The evidence is overwhelming. This is truly
>> > a case closed.

>> > Max

>> Perhaps true, Max--lawyers are an incredibly stupid bunch.

>The are more intelligent than the average guy. But more important -
>they have been educated to  apply logic.
>The *** nutters have failed complete in giving a least a little
>bit convincing narrative of the JFK assassination. We know enough
>today about Oswald and his path on November 22nd, about Ruby and what
>he did the same day, the gun, the bullets, the injuries, the
>acoustics, the surgery, the transport to Washington, the autopsy to
>conclude with almost 100 % certainty that Oswald killed Kennedy and
>that he killed him alome.
>But it is the same with 9/11 - there will always be losers who jump
>onto every possibility of a ***. Because government is evil and
>therefore responsible for their individual failure in life.
>Hazey is a nice example. So are you.

>Max

I happen to be rich and famous BUT i don't want to lose it to some
***ing liberal negro in washington who thinks i did not earn it
myself and who wants to give it away to some unwed *** for who i am
already paying for her birth control and ***s.

get it now?

 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Calimer » Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:36:14


Quote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 07:09:59 -0800 (PST), Calimero



> >> . Every lawyer would agree that Oswald was

> >> > responsible, and he alone. The evidence is overwhelming. This is truly
> >> > a case closed.

> >> > Max

> >> Perhaps true, Max--lawyers are an incredibly stupid bunch.

> >The are more intelligent than the average guy. But more important -
> >they have been educated to ?apply logic.
> >The *** nutters have failed complete in giving a least a little
> >bit convincing narrative of the JFK assassination. We know enough
> >today about Oswald and his path on November 22nd, about Ruby and what
> >he did the same day, the gun, the bullets, the injuries, the
> >acoustics, the surgery, the transport to Washington, the autopsy to
> >conclude with almost 100 % certainty that Oswald killed Kennedy and
> >that he killed him alome.
> >But it is the same with 9/11 - there will always be losers who jump
> >onto every possibility of a ***. Because government is evil and
> >therefore responsible for their individual failure in life.
> >Hazey is a nice example. So are you.

> >Max

> I happen to be rich and famous

Famous yes, but RICH???

Quote:
> BUT i don't want to lose it to some
> ***ing liberal negro in washington who thinks i did not earn it
> myself and who wants to give it away to some unwed *** for who i am
> already paying for her birth control and ***s.

> get it now?

No.

Max

 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Iceber » Wed, 16 Jan 2013 04:25:53


Quote:

> >http://SportToday.org/

> > Every ***ing thing that comes out of washington dc is a LIE !!!

> I don't think RFK jr. is lying. He simply doesn't know better and
> clings to *** theories.
> Same as you clinging to your guns and the bible.

is that the same as you clinging to the notion that the German police
should have guns, even though there's no justification for it?
 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Iceber » Wed, 16 Jan 2013 04:30:48


Quote:

> > . Every lawyer would agree that Oswald was

> > > responsible, and he alone. The evidence is overwhelming. This is truly
> > > a case closed.

> > > Max

> > Perhaps true, Max--lawyers are an incredibly stupid bunch.

> The are more intelligent than the average guy. But more important -
> they have been educated to ?apply logic.
> The *** nutters have failed complete in giving a least a little
> bit convincing narrative of the JFK assassination. We know enough
> today about Oswald and his path on November 22nd, about Ruby and what
> he did the same day, the gun, the bullets, the injuries, the
> acoustics, the surgery, the transport to Washington, the autopsy to
> conclude with almost 100 % certainty that Oswald killed Kennedy and
> that he killed him alome.
> But it is the same with 9/11 - there will always be losers who jump
> onto every possibility of a ***. Because government is evil and
> therefore responsible for their individual failure in life.
> Hazey is a nice example. So are you.

the problem is the questions surrounding Jack Ruby and his motives, he
even said it was a ***. You've have to be naive to ignore
everything. Lawyers also twist things to suit whatever case they can
get away with, many people in situations would call that lying, but a
lawyer wouldn't.
 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Iceber » Wed, 16 Jan 2013 04:42:28


Quote:

> > . Every lawyer would agree that Oswald was

> > > responsible, and he alone. The evidence is overwhelming. This is truly
> > > a case closed.

> > > Max

> > Perhaps true, Max--lawyers are an incredibly stupid bunch.

> The are more intelligent than the average guy. But more important -
> they have been educated to ?apply logic.
> The *** nutters have failed complete in giving a least a little
> bit convincing narrative of the JFK assassination. We know enough
> today about Oswald and his path on November 22nd, about Ruby and what
> he did the same day, the gun, the bullets, the injuries, the
> acoustics, the surgery, the transport to Washington, the autopsy to
> conclude with almost 100 % certainty that Oswald killed Kennedy and
> that he killed him alome.
> But it is the same with 9/11 - there will always be losers who jump
> onto every possibility of a ***. Because government is evil and
> therefore responsible for their individual failure in life.
> Hazey is a nice example. So are you.

not forgetting why are Oswald's tax returns classified still? once
they come out, we'll know whether it was a govt *** or not,
didn't Clinton hint that it would be undeniable?
 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Calimer » Wed, 16 Jan 2013 07:47:04


Quote:


> > >http://SportToday.org/

> > > Every ***ing thing that comes out of washington dc is a LIE !!!

> > I don't think RFK jr. is lying. He simply doesn't know better and
> > clings to *** theories.
> > Same as you clinging to your guns and the bible.

> is that the same as you clinging to the notion that the German police
> should have guns, even though there's no justification for it?

There is every justification, son.

Max

 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Calimer » Wed, 16 Jan 2013 07:48:51


Quote:


> > > . Every lawyer would agree that Oswald was

> > > > responsible, and he alone. The evidence is overwhelming. This is truly
> > > > a case closed.

> > > > Max

> > > Perhaps true, Max--lawyers are an incredibly stupid bunch.

> > The are more intelligent than the average guy. But more important -
> > they have been educated to ?apply logic.
> > The *** nutters have failed complete in giving a least a little
> > bit convincing narrative of the JFK assassination. We know enough
> > today about Oswald and his path on November 22nd, about Ruby and what
> > he did the same day, the gun, the bullets, the injuries, the
> > acoustics, the surgery, the transport to Washington, the autopsy to
> > conclude with almost 100 % certainty that Oswald killed Kennedy and
> > that he killed him alome.
> > But it is the same with 9/11 - there will always be losers who jump
> > onto every possibility of a ***. Because government is evil and
> > therefore responsible for their individual failure in life.
> > Hazey is a nice example. So are you.

> not forgetting why are Oswald's tax returns classified still? once
> they come out, we'll know whether it was a govt *** or not,
> didn't Clinton hint that it would be undeniable?

You think Oswald declared the money he received from the CIA, the
Mafia or the Jews ... ?
No wonder his tax returns are still "classified" (lol).

Max

 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Iceber » Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:05:20


Quote:



> > > > . Every lawyer would agree that Oswald was

> > > > > responsible, and he alone. The evidence is overwhelming. This is truly
> > > > > a case closed.

> > > > > Max

> > > > Perhaps true, Max--lawyers are an incredibly stupid bunch.

> > > The are more intelligent than the average guy. But more important -
> > > they have been educated to ?apply logic.
> > > The *** nutters have failed complete in giving a least a little
> > > bit convincing narrative of the JFK assassination. We know enough
> > > today about Oswald and his path on November 22nd, about Ruby and what
> > > he did the same day, the gun, the bullets, the injuries, the
> > > acoustics, the surgery, the transport to Washington, the autopsy to
> > > conclude with almost 100 % certainty that Oswald killed Kennedy and
> > > that he killed him alome.
> > > But it is the same with 9/11 - there will always be losers who jump
> > > onto every possibility of a ***. Because government is evil and
> > > therefore responsible for their individual failure in life.
> > > Hazey is a nice example. So are you.

> > not forgetting why are Oswald's tax returns classified still? once
> > they come out, we'll know whether it was a govt *** or not,
> > didn't Clinton hint that it would be undeniable?

> You think Oswald declared the money he received from the CIA, the
> Mafia or the Jews ... ?
> No wonder his tax returns are still "classified" (lol).

nice avoidance ;)
 
 
 

RFK JR: Evidence 'Very Convincing' Lone Gunman Did Not Kill JFK...

Post by Iceber » Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:05:42


Quote:



> > > >http://SportToday.org/

> > > > Every ***ing thing that comes out of washington dc is a LIE !!!

> > > I don't think RFK jr. is lying. He simply doesn't know better and
> > > clings to *** theories.
> > > Same as you clinging to your guns and the bible.

> > is that the same as you clinging to the notion that the German police
> > should have guns, even though there's no justification for it?

> There is every justification, son.

like what? police in the UK don't have guns.