>Five years is such a long time that any of the current crop of top
>juniors could be top pros in that time frame. Also, the current crop of
>rookies is looking good. Nadal, Gasquet, Berdych, Monfils, etc... They
>are not consistent performers yet (Neither was Fed when he was 18-21)
>but they are climbing the rankings fast. Once those kids supplant the
>current top-10 which is filled with Fed's ***es, Fed MAY be in
That "may" happen but I seriously doubt it will in the next 2 years.
And even then "if" it happens these guys "may" not be in the league of
Borg, Sampras, Federer and most likely will not be but more likely in
the Roddick, Hewitt, league and it will be simply more of the same
canon fodder for Fed.
But, even if they are in the Federer class they still have to deal
with Federer !
The odds of somebody coming up in the next few years who will
dominate Fed like he is dominating everyone else now is well, close to
But, even if he faces an equal competitor like himself which is
doubful you can stilll count on him to win 2 slams a year !
In that event, he still wipes out Pete's record in 5 years.