Quote:
> >> Personally I wouldn't buy one!.
> > For the reason mentioned above, or because you've *got* to have
> >Pryde, Gaastra on the sail ;-)
> The main reason I wouldn't buy one is because I hate encouraging copiers
> they copy the cut of a sail such as a pryde and then sell them at really
> low prices because they haven't had the development costs, OK that's fine
> all the time there's only one or two manufacturers doing it. But if they
> really hit the sales of pryde gaastra north ezzy etc etc all the manufacturers
> that are inovative, then maybe we won't see so many new designs coming out
> because the genuine designers won't have the dosh!!!
Really think that will happen? North, Pryde, etc will always command
a premium price because of their name and the quality they are supposed or
expected to carry. People will always prefer to buy a premium product, and
will generally continue to do so *if* they can afford it. Those that can't
wouldn't have bought the real item if they hand't bought a clone item ...
tehy'd have still bought another cheaper item :-)
Quote:
> And yes I do have one gaastra sail and a couple of pryde sails and a cheap
> hot wave. As for cycling the sails, not me I'll stick with the sails I've got
> until they're kaput out of shape or whatever, I wonder how long the GUNs will
> stay in shape!
> On the other hand maybe it'll just reduce the cost of the bigger brands.
Considering that this is the only dissenting comment from various
people in a number of countries you could be viewed as being a little harsh
:-) Everybody with the exception of yourself (across 4 countries) have been
positive about Gun sails when mentioning their quality, price and
performance. Personally if I buy a Gun sail I don't actually expect the
performance or life expectancy of a top shelf sail as Gun sails here are
currently just over half the price of a Pryde or North at retail ... if it
does come close to a Pryde then bonus :-)
I presume that if you were in the market for a PC a few years ago
you'd have only bought an IBM rather than a compatible?
--