I'm familiar with his argument that the climate influenced which
animals and crops could grow where, in fact, I think that's his biggest
breakthrough in the book. I guess I wasn't that clear in my post. I
just look at Europe (where I grew up), and basically the colder it gets
the stronger the economy (all within a climate that allows for farm
animals and crops). Then you've got places (not in Europe) where
enough food grows on the land and the weather is mild enough so that
you can basically just sit around and do nothing but fish once in a
while and survive comfortably. Clearly, there is no reason for those
guys to develop agriculture and so on, much less nucular weapons.
I also think there is a simple human thing that happens when it gets
hot. You get lazy, and I don't just mean lazy while it's really hot.
You're whole outlook changes, you slow down, etc., and this is a
longterm change. You're not going to start running around because the
temperature drops for a few days. Take that same person and put him
somwhere where he's freezing his ***off, and soon enough he'll be
busy as a bee. I could go into details of physiology of why this is
so, but I think it's all pretty obvious. I was just surprised he
didn't bring this more into the book. (I experienced this first hand
after moving to a very warm climate).
Try to tivo the TV show, it's fascinating. They have footage of people
cultivating roots with hand tools, much the same way they did hundreds
of years ago, and you can really see how growing enough food is a full
time job, and one that doesn't benefit from any kind of mass
agriculture. We're talking one root, one tool, one person, and a lot
of work to get it into an edible state.
Quote:
> > Fascinating book/tv show, but I think he didn't get into enough detail
> > on the climate side of things. Not saying his arguments are not a
> > factor, but you also have to include climate. The more inhospitable it
> > is, the faster people develop technologies and the more they work.
> > Makes sense if you think about it.
> Didn't see the TV show, but read the book...
> I think Jared did talk about climate in detail...reread Chapter 10...
> This is a major part of his premise...
> He definitely didn't make your conclusion(s) about climate...with
> inhospitable climates you have to spend all of your time hunting and
> gathering...trying to stay alive...not sitting around fat, dumb, and
> lazy academically masturbating about windsurfing vs. kiting, or
> windsurfing vs. curling...;-)
> He succinctly laid out how Eurasia is situated primarily along an
> East/West latitudinal line...similar climate over a broad area...same
> day length and seasonal variation...major determinant of
> climate...growing conditions, and ease of spread of food
> production...this gave that continent a huge advantage...
> Fertile Crescent domesticates spread rapidly along East/West latitudinal
> lines because of this climatic adaptation...and allowed people to move
> into farming and storing food , rather than being tied to
> hunter/gatherer subsistence...which in turn gave their society the
> ability to develop steel and guns...mount armies to move forward and
> conquer other peoples...and spread their germs...
> WARDOG
> http://SportToday.org/
> > Fascinating book/tv show, but I think he didn't get into enough detail
> > on the climate side of things. Not saying his arguments are not a
> > factor, but you also have to include climate. The more inhospitable it
> > is, the faster people develop technologies and the more they work.
> > Makes sense if you think about it.
> > In a way this is what I don't like about kiting. There's much less
> > work required to get good, but then it bites you in the ass on the
> > other side (safety). OTOH, if I do eventually move to San Diego, I may
> > pick it up... or not. We'll see. It's a few years out yet.
> >>Per kurt:
> >>>Anyone in here read "Guns, Germs, & Steel"?
> >>Didn't read it, but saw the TV version on PBS.
> >>The part about New Guinea and the base requirements for technological
> >>development in general was fascinating.