Bend in the mast is another possible problem, but at least you can
rotate the mast to 'unbend' it... you cant rotate the extension
Peter
Keeping the gear in the shade is key. My friends who do similar
things (with less shady storage) seem to get two years out of their
sails before they start to fall apart.
For me, I'd say that nothing has been badly damaged by keeping them
rigged. The gear still sails as well as the day it was new - and life
is good. Yes, the base collar would not have seized if I'd de-rigged
and rinsed on a daily basis - but that being said, the Streamlined
base is so strong, that after freeing up the collar, one quick wipe
down and the metal was looking to be in great shape.
I'm going to break down my other three rigs and change out all of the
lines. I just noticed some minor rope chafing adjacent to the cleats,
so it's about that time.
Note: I don't know if I'd do this to a large race sail. There's only
so much punishment you can put carbon, metal, cloth and plastic
through ;-)
I'm glad you mentioned that shade is key. Since the OP didn't say
where they are, I'll hypothesize that if you left a race sail rigged
on the beach somewhere like Corpus Christi in the summertime, I'd give
the mast a couple of hours and the sail a couple of weeks. Of course,
I may be wrong again. ;)
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:06:05 -0700, youngwatery
>I've had my current wave sails rigged and fully tensioned for two
>years. I de-rigged two sails recently (just got some new ones to
>abuse) and had to whack on the base a bit to free up the adjustable
>collar. The mast was slightly bent, but not half as much originally
>anticipated. The sail material (X-Ply) and Dacron luff sleeve is in
>really great shape. I was rather impressed. They've still got years
>left in them at this rate.
>Keeping the gear in the shade is key. My friends who do similar
>things (with less shady storage) seem to get two years out of their
>sails before they start to fall apart.
>For me, I'd say that nothing has been badly damaged by keeping them
>rigged. The gear still sails as well as the day it was new - and life
>is good. Yes, the base collar would not have seized if I'd de-rigged
>and rinsed on a daily basis - but that being said, the Streamlined
>base is so strong, that after freeing up the collar, one quick wipe
>down and the metal was looking to be in great shape.
>I'm going to break down my other three rigs and change out all of the
>lines. I just noticed some minor rope chafing adjacent to the cleats,
>so it's about that time.
>Note: I don't know if I'd do this to a large race sail. There's only
>so much punishment you can put carbon, metal, cloth and plastic
>through ;-)
--
Richard
Huntington Beach, CA
> I'm glad you mentioned that shade is key. Since the OP didn't say
> where they are, I'll hypothesize that if you left a race sail rigged
> on the beach somewhere like Corpus Christi in the summertime, I'd give
> the mast a couple of hours and the sail a couple of weeks. Of course,
> I may be wrong again. ;)
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:06:05 -0700, youngwatery
> >> How long can I leave a monofilm sail rigged? Will long term rigging
> >> damage anything?
> >I've had my current wave sails rigged and fully tensioned for two
> >years. I de-rigged two sails recently (just got some new ones to
> >abuse) and had to whack on the base a bit to free up the adjustable
> >collar. The mast was slightly bent, but not half as much originally
> >anticipated. The sail material (X-Ply) and Dacron luff sleeve is in
> >really great shape. I was rather impressed. They've still got years
> >left in them at this rate.
> >Keeping the gear in the shade is key. My friends who do similar
> >things (with less shady storage) seem to get two years out of their
> >sails before they start to fall apart.
> >For me, I'd say that nothing has been badly damaged by keeping them
> >rigged. The gear still sails as well as the day it was new - and life
> >is good. Yes, the base collar would not have seized if I'd de-rigged
> >and rinsed on a daily basis - but that being said, the Streamlined
> >base is so strong, that after freeing up the collar, one quick wipe
> >down and the metal was looking to be in great shape.
> >I'm going to break down my other three rigs and change out all of the
> >lines. I just noticed some minor rope chafing adjacent to the cleats,
> >so it's about that time.
> >Note: I don't know if I'd do this to a large race sail. There's only
> >so much punishment you can put carbon, metal, cloth and plastic
> >through ;-)
Yep, gotta have a tarp. I looked all over before I found a silver one.
g
My Q to you is, if you would suggest that it's not actually better for a
sail to stay rigged. Perhaps Dave E. would be interested, too, and check
your sail for elongation, stretch and creep at the seams against the
original templates...
--
florian - NY22
http://www.kasail.com/windsurfing/team/florianfeuser.html
>I've had my infinity 7.5 rigged for about a year. I store it clew
>facing directly up in a small shady wood right on the beach. It gets
>some ants in the mast occasionally but seems exactly the same as when
>I bought it.
>I leave it fully down and outhauled too.
>The way I look at it is that I go out much more often even if the
>weather is marginal. If it's not so windy further out I just put it
>away again.
>You buy the gear to use. If it encourages you to go out more leave it
>rigged, even if the life is shortened a bit.
>g
So there you have it - straight from the mouth of a manufacturer...
> Funny you should mention that detail! I was chatting with Barry Spanier...
>So there you have it - straight from the mouth of a manufacturer...
>>Funny you should mention that detail! I was chatting with Barry
>>Spanier recently about this subject and he mentioned that if I were to
>>back off the downhaul to ease the tension on the rig (which, per my
>>previous post, I don't do), that I should also back off the outhaul
>>too. He suggested that the outhaul be released first - and then let
>>off the downhaul till the mast straightens.
>>So there you have it - straight from the mouth of a manufacturer...
>I was chatting with Bill Gates and he agrees. :)
Glenn