Any heavyweights used this board?? Opinions.....Anyone??
Thanks.
Thanks.
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Didn't really like the feel. Techno is much quicker to respond. Switched
to the 117 liter version for the remainder of the vacation, and liked it.
Visit my web page at:
http://www.msnhomepages.talkcity.com/BoxSeatBlvd/lowjiber/
to see my wife with one later in the week. She liked it, but was using a
much smaller sail.
Trust this helps....
'
John Crumpley
JAWS Jax, Fl
Re: "Didn't really like the feel."
I have tried the 2000 HS Fanatic Bee 144, 117, 104, and 94 at Aruba's
Sailboard Vacations in February. I also did not like the feel. Comparing
to the 1999 HS boards, the 2000 equivalent boards are noticeably slower to
respond. This may be due to the position of the powerbox. I like the fins
in the aft position on trim boxes, and I can't do that with the new
powerboxes.
Dan
> Thanks.
I like a board works in strong winds, but can still be uphauled and
slogged
if the wind dies. I'm sure there are better boards for every condition,
but if
I could only keep one board it would be the Bee.
2. Bee 289(144) vs. Techno 283
3. Mast Foot Position on a Bee 289 ( 144 )
4. Fanatic Cat & Fanatic Bee Info
5. Anyone Know Any Fanatic Team Riders?
6. Fanatic Skate 63, anyone sailed?
7. Anyone sailed a Fanatic Rat?
8. Anyone sailed the new Fanatic Falcon?
9. us 144
10. Planing Threshold: Same Sailor/Sail: Starboard 120/131/144?
11. What is the best bag for a Carve 144?
12. Thinking about getting a Carve 144...
13. Carve 144 vs JP FreeRide 145?