> > Possibly because of html content, it seems that the original post on this
> > thread (and some others like it) come through as blank pages, at least with
> > the version of M'soft Internet Mail and News that comes with Internet
> > Explorer 3.0
> > Eeeck, do I really need to upgrade my browser to receive posts sent this
> > Just wondering, that's all.
> Bad form to respond to my own question, but I've just discovered that hitting
> "reply" on the blank post results in the post now showing, with the usual
> quotation marks for a reply. This is a possible workaround for those
> similarly afflicted :)
> 'Come fly with me...'
You wouldn't believe the probs I had with IE4. Changed to Netscape and
end of worries - downside is a different system to learn, and Explorer
is an MS product - so (technically) fits in with windoze. Still - I'm
happy with Netscape and also was happy with Explorer(until those odd
little characters began appearing). It's a matter of personal choice as
far as I can see, rather that which is best. Somewhere in IE is a
preference to allow the reception of HTML, but that may be for receive -
can't remember. :O)
Aik - who uses Netscape now out of spite - BG gets more money than me
And his shirt was made of fish n chips, and his name was Aiken Drum.
http://surf.to/a-edwards (but it's not too healthy just now...)
AFE dg+>++ ka+>++ d+>+ m> ot+>++ b+>++ tq- i+ c+>- l++ afec+ a? f++>+