Quote:
> Saucony 3D Grid Triumph
> Any comments from anyone who's run in these and might also be a
> heavy/neutral guy? Or maybe other suggestions?
I don't know the Triumph but did own Saucony's "3D Grid Web" two years
ago. They were my least favorite running shoe ever - heavy +
inflexible = brick - but then I'm not a big guy and the 30 pounds
heavier I was then still came to under 175. This Triumph may be a very
different shoe and/or better for you than for me.
Of course fit is an issue, and if you're looking at mailorder,
anticipate that you may have to send a pair or two back before you get
something that works. I'll order something I haven't already worn only
if it's on super duper clearance, reckoning the prospect of shoes for
$20-30 balances the risk of a poor fit (the only Saucony which has
really fit me right is their Fastwitch flat) or other reason to send it
back.
Speaking of cheap, how's $30? I don't hate my $30 last year's model
Vitruvian Proportions:
http://www.vitruvianrunning.com/models.html
They're not light but their old-skool solid sheet (as opposed to
compression molded) EVA midsole feels extraordinarily protective
between my feet and the pavement, and it seems like it'd be very good
cushioning for a heavy runner who didn't need much motion control. I
like to throw them into the mix when I gotta run a lot of miles on
pavement - on softer surfaces I'd rather run in less shoe.
If these catch your interest, be aware the Proportions really do run
small. I wear 7.5 or 8 street shoes, 8.5 in most running shoes (Nike,
Asics, Brooks, Saucony Fastwitch), and the 8.5 Proportion is snug, OK
for most runs but a few barleycorns too small for long runs.