Cardio and weight training

Cardio and weight training

Post by Paul Gros » Mon, 18 Feb 2002 01:38:33


Here is another question. It has been suggested on misc.fitness.weights that
excessive amounts of cardio and/or high intensity cardio (described as 4-5
hours per week and/or sessions including 80% of max hr) will produce a
catabolic effect whereby muscle tissue is actually broken down. Has anyone
on this list any knowledge of this or is it b.s.? I am not talking about
running marathons but a simple weekly regimen of effective cardio training
through running and cycling coupled with a 2X per week basic weight training
routine to maintain muscle mass. No aspirations of bodybuilding or
powerlifting either.

Comments?

Thanks,

Paul

 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by One Spee » Mon, 18 Feb 2002 03:41:20

Anytime you subject your muscles to stress cortisol is released (cortisol is
a hormone released during all sorts of stress).  It increases the rate at
which protein in the muscles in broken down ("catabolic effect").

This is true for weight training as well as aerobic excercise.

With proper nutrition and rest your body builds itself back up.  Certainly
there is a point where you can exceed your bodies ability to recover, but
from the regimen you describe I would not be concerned.

Jeff


Quote:
> Here is another question. It has been suggested on misc.fitness.weights
that
> excessive amounts of cardio and/or high intensity cardio (described as 4-5
> hours per week and/or sessions including 80% of max hr) will produce a
> catabolic effect whereby muscle tissue is actually broken down. Has anyone
> on this list any knowledge of this or is it b.s.? I am not talking about
> running marathons but a simple weekly regimen of effective cardio training
> through running and cycling coupled with a 2X per week basic weight
training
> routine to maintain muscle mass. No aspirations of bodybuilding or
> powerlifting either.

> Comments?

> Thanks,

> Paul


 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by Paul Gros » Mon, 18 Feb 2002 04:04:20

Thank you Jeff.

Paul


Quote:
> Anytime you subject your muscles to stress cortisol is released (cortisol
is
> a hormone released during all sorts of stress).  It increases the rate at
> which protein in the muscles in broken down ("catabolic effect").

> This is true for weight training as well as aerobic excercise.

> With proper nutrition and rest your body builds itself back up.  Certainly
> there is a point where you can exceed your bodies ability to recover, but
> from the regimen you describe I would not be concerned.

> Jeff



> > Here is another question. It has been suggested on misc.fitness.weights
> that
> > excessive amounts of cardio and/or high intensity cardio (described as
4-5
> > hours per week and/or sessions including 80% of max hr) will produce a
> > catabolic effect whereby muscle tissue is actually broken down. Has
anyone
> > on this list any knowledge of this or is it b.s.? I am not talking about
> > running marathons but a simple weekly regimen of effective cardio
training
> > through running and cycling coupled with a 2X per week basic weight
> training
> > routine to maintain muscle mass. No aspirations of bodybuilding or
> > powerlifting either.

> > Comments?

> > Thanks,

> > Paul


 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by Steve Freide » Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:15:15

Quote:

> Here is another question. It has been suggested on misc.fitness.weights that
> excessive amounts of cardio and/or high intensity cardio (described as 4-5
> hours per week and/or sessions including 80% of max hr) will produce a
> catabolic effect whereby muscle tissue is actually broken down. Has anyone
> on this list any knowledge of this or is it b.s.?

No, it is not b.s.  Quite a few people on m.f.w. know what they're
talking about and you'll find they all agree on this point.

Quote:
> I am not talking about
> running marathons but a simple weekly regimen of effective cardio training
> through running and cycling coupled with a 2X per week basic weight training
> routine to maintain muscle mass. No aspirations of bodybuilding or
> powerlifting either.

> Comments?

Sure.  "We are each an experiment of one." - Dr. George Sheehan.  Try
different things to figure out what works for you.

I run 15-20 miles a week, swim two or thee times per week, and bicycle
once or twice per week, and I've managed to add a few pounds of lean
muscle mass to my body since the Fall - go figure, eh?  It's very tough
to do and I tried many things in my training schedule to allow even this
little bit to happen.

Very short, intense, anaerobic interval work is what works best with
weight training for increased muscle mass.  Comfortable, conversational
aerobic exercise can co-exist with gaining muscle but the two do work at
cross purposes and any muscle gains will be small, although significant
strength gains can still be achieved by a relative beginner.
Slightly-too-intense aerobic exercise and/or lots of lactate-threshold
work will ruin any possibility of gaining muscle.

Steve "mfw regular, er, irregular, well, regular but not normal,
well..." Freides

 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by amh » Mon, 18 Feb 2002 19:49:20

Quote:

> Here is another question. It has been suggested on misc.fitness.weights that
> excessive amounts of cardio and/or high intensity cardio (described as 4-5
> hours per week and/or sessions including 80% of max hr) will produce a
> catabolic effect whereby muscle tissue is actually broken down. Has anyone
> on this list any knowledge of this or is it b.s.? I am not talking about

Catabolic effect? I'm not familiar with this term.

But my basic knowledge of running (and for that matter any exercise) is that
every time you do a physical activity muscle fibers are broken. Imagine you are
stretching hundereds of *** bands, a few will break but most won't.

The good news is that unlike *** bands muscles repair themselves. In fact
this is how people get stronger, faster and so on. Muscles fibers that are
broken repair them better than before. This process also adds miles of ***
capalaries to increas *** flow to the area that is being used.

I don't know the exact numbers for when muscles break down, it has to be vastly
different for individuals. But any combined effect of intensity and time can
trigger this effect in me. That muscle soreness you experience after a workout
or run is your body repairing itself.

Answer, it isn't bs.

Andy

Quote:

> running marathons but a simple weekly regimen of effective cardio training
> through running and cycling coupled with a 2X per week basic weight training
> routine to maintain muscle mass. No aspirations of bodybuilding or
> powerlifting either.

> Comments?

> Thanks,

> Paul

 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by Steve Freide » Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:53:11

Catabolism refers to your body eating itself for fuel, for lack of a
more scientific way of saying it.  In the weights word, anabolism and
catabolism are the two opposites, gaining lean muscle mass and losing
it, respectively.

Aerobic exercise and also diets high in carbohydrates and low in protein
have been shown to be catabolic, which is why you don't see many
Schwartenegger-like physiques winning marathons.

-S-

Quote:


> > Here is another question. It has been suggested on misc.fitness.weights that
> > excessive amounts of cardio and/or high intensity cardio (described as 4-5
> > hours per week and/or sessions including 80% of max hr) will produce a
> > catabolic effect whereby muscle tissue is actually broken down. Has anyone
> > on this list any knowledge of this or is it b.s.? I am not talking about

> Catabolic effect? I'm not familiar with this term.

> But my basic knowledge of running (and for that matter any exercise) is that
> every time you do a physical activity muscle fibers are broken. Imagine you are
> stretching hundereds of *** bands, a few will break but most won't.

> The good news is that unlike *** bands muscles repair themselves. In fact
> this is how people get stronger, faster and so on. Muscles fibers that are
> broken repair them better than before. This process also adds miles of ***
> capalaries to increas *** flow to the area that is being used.

> I don't know the exact numbers for when muscles break down, it has to be vastly
> different for individuals. But any combined effect of intensity and time can
> trigger this effect in me. That muscle soreness you experience after a workout
> or run is your body repairing itself.

> Answer, it isn't bs.

> Andy

> > running marathons but a simple weekly regimen of effective cardio training
> > through running and cycling coupled with a 2X per week basic weight training
> > routine to maintain muscle mass. No aspirations of bodybuilding or
> > powerlifting either.

> > Comments?

> > Thanks,

> > Paul

 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by Paul Gros » Tue, 19 Feb 2002 03:18:29

Thanks for the comments guys. I couldn't get much of an answer to a similar
question of m.f.w. so I am glad I got some logical responses here.

Paul

 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by Lynd » Tue, 19 Feb 2002 05:37:34

I agree with Steve. I very rarely post there, but much of the stuff on
misc.fitness.weights is not bs.  What is BS is the stuff Jeff posted in this
thread.

There is quite a bit of scientific (peer-reviewed) evidence that endurance
training and weight training do not mix well.  Weight training does not seem to
affect endurance gains (and may improve endurance performance if done
properly), but endurance training reduces strength gains by ata least half:

Hortobagyi, T., Katch, F. I., & Lachance, P. F. (1991). Effects of simultaneous
training for strength and endurance on upper and lower body strength and
running performance. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 31,
20-30.

This one is oriented toward improving runing performance, but talks about what
kinds of strength training do and do not mix with endurance (both Sam and I
have written about this one in the past):

http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/86/5/1527

If you are a beginner, you may be able to mix weights with endurance training
and make gains (in strength but not necessarily mass)  for about 6-10 weeks;
This is the period when you are training the nervous system to recruit more
muscle fibers, and it is only after this period that true "strength training"
(making muscle fibers larger or more of them) actually occurs. This
neuromuscular activation is all that long distance runners often are looking
for, and if this is all that you are looking for (you will get maybe 25%
stronger but not any bigger), then fine: You can do just one set of 8-12 to
failure and not worry about mixing the contrasting training methods; Once
again, though, this is not going to make you look like "muscle beach" material
(or Maurice Greene, for that matter).

But getting beyond this initial stage is what strength training programs are
all about.  And pretty much everything that really works for endurance
performance (anything hard) wipes out your strength gains.  You have to keep
your MHR during sustained runs below 80% (this is covered in most certification
training for personal trainers, and any PT worth his salt will tell you about
this).

Even in sprint workouts (very intense but short intervals), you have to be
careful.  Alactic workouts (which by definition do not produce lactate) like 6
X 60 flying with 5-8 minute rest or 3 X 3 X 60 with 2-3 minute (reps)/ 5-6
minute (sets) will not impair strength gains (much), but so-called glycolytic
workouts like 8 X 80 with 45 second rest or 6 X 200 with 12-15 minute rest,
will produce lactate loads that can impair strength training performance.  At
maximum intensity, lactate production begins to rise significantly after 20
seconds (when the alactic system is basically exhausted until ATP/CP can be
recovered) and the RATE of lactate production peaks at about 40 seconds (this
is why 400 meter runers often to repeats of about 300 meters); You cannot do
much of this kind of stuff and maintain any kind of strength gains.  

Whether you need to worry about any of this depends on what kind of gains you
are looking for from your strength training program.

Lyndon
"Speed Kills.  It kills those that don't have it" --Brooks Johnson

 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by Paul Gros » Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:47:51

Lyndon, thanks. I appreciate the comments. I never said what is posted on
m.f.w. is BS...rather I was only referring to this particular concept.
Didn't mean to offend. I am just trying to get some information from a
community of folks who probably have more knowledge than I do on this
subject.

Paul

Quote:
> I agree with Steve. I very rarely post there, but much of the stuff on
> misc.fitness.weights is not bs.  What is BS is the stuff Jeff posted in
this
> thread.

> There is quite a bit of scientific (peer-reviewed) evidence that endurance
> training and weight training do not mix well.  Weight training does not
seem to
> affect endurance gains (and may improve endurance performance if done
> properly), but endurance training reduces strength gains by ata least
half:

> Hortobagyi, T., Katch, F. I., & Lachance, P. F. (1991). Effects of
simultaneous
> training for strength and endurance on upper and lower body strength and
> running performance. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness,
31,
> 20-30.

> This one is oriented toward improving runing performance, but talks about
what
> kinds of strength training do and do not mix with endurance (both Sam and
I
> have written about this one in the past):

> http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/86/5/1527

> If you are a beginner, you may be able to mix weights with endurance
training
> and make gains (in strength but not necessarily mass)  for about 6-10
weeks;
> This is the period when you are training the nervous system to recruit
more
> muscle fibers, and it is only after this period that true "strength
training"
> (making muscle fibers larger or more of them) actually occurs. This
> neuromuscular activation is all that long distance runners often are
looking
> for, and if this is all that you are looking for (you will get maybe 25%
> stronger but not any bigger), then fine: You can do just one set of 8-12
to
> failure and not worry about mixing the contrasting training methods; Once
> again, though, this is not going to make you look like "muscle beach"
material
> (or Maurice Greene, for that matter).

> But getting beyond this initial stage is what strength training programs
are
> all about.  And pretty much everything that really works for endurance
> performance (anything hard) wipes out your strength gains.  You have to
keep
> your MHR during sustained runs below 80% (this is covered in most
certification
> training for personal trainers, and any PT worth his salt will tell you
about
> this).

> Even in sprint workouts (very intense but short intervals), you have to be
> careful.  Alactic workouts (which by definition do not produce lactate)
like 6
> X 60 flying with 5-8 minute rest or 3 X 3 X 60 with 2-3 minute (reps)/ 5-6
> minute (sets) will not impair strength gains (much), but so-called
glycolytic
> workouts like 8 X 80 with 45 second rest or 6 X 200 with 12-15 minute
rest,
> will produce lactate loads that can impair strength training performance.
At
> maximum intensity, lactate production begins to rise significantly after
20
> seconds (when the alactic system is basically exhausted until ATP/CP can
be
> recovered) and the RATE of lactate production peaks at about 40 seconds
(this
> is why 400 meter runers often to repeats of about 300 meters); You cannot
do
> much of this kind of stuff and maintain any kind of strength gains.

> Whether you need to worry about any of this depends on what kind of gains
you
> are looking for from your strength training program.

> Lyndon
> "Speed Kills.  It kills those that don't have it" --Brooks Johnson

 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by Don Baile » Wed, 20 Feb 2002 00:25:46

So it's really not possible to look like
the guys in the bowflex commercial (or even
close to it) and run  miles 3-4 times a week.

Man,

I have been wasting my time lifting then...

Im sure I get my MHR above 80% when I run too.

I have been lifting for about 3 months now. I have been
running 3 years.  I only do upper body stuff. I would just
like to tone up my arms chest and back a little. I have made
small noticeable gains, but not Iike I would expect when I used
to lift years ago before I started running.

Maybe I should cut back the running to 2 times a week.

db


Quote:
> Catabolism refers to your body eating itself for fuel, for lack of a
> more scientific way of saying it.  In the weights word, anabolism and
> catabolism are the two opposites, gaining lean muscle mass and losing
> it, respectively.

> Aerobic exercise and also diets high in carbohydrates and low in protein
> have been shown to be catabolic, which is why you don't see many
> Schwartenegger-like physiques winning marathons.

> -S-



> > > Here is another question. It has been suggested on

misc.fitness.weights that

- Show quoted text -

Quote:
> > > excessive amounts of cardio and/or high intensity cardio (described as
4-5
> > > hours per week and/or sessions including 80% of max hr) will produce a
> > > catabolic effect whereby muscle tissue is actually broken down. Has
anyone
> > > on this list any knowledge of this or is it b.s.? I am not talking
about

> > Catabolic effect? I'm not familiar with this term.

> > But my basic knowledge of running (and for that matter any exercise) is
that
> > every time you do a physical activity muscle fibers are broken. Imagine
you are
> > stretching hundereds of *** bands, a few will break but most won't.

> > The good news is that unlike *** bands muscles repair themselves. In
fact
> > this is how people get stronger, faster and so on. Muscles fibers that
are
> > broken repair them better than before. This process also adds miles of
***
> > capalaries to increas *** flow to the area that is being used.

> > I don't know the exact numbers for when muscles break down, it has to be
vastly
> > different for individuals. But any combined effect of intensity and time
can
> > trigger this effect in me. That muscle soreness you experience after a
workout
> > or run is your body repairing itself.

> > Answer, it isn't bs.

> > Andy

> > > running marathons but a simple weekly regimen of effective cardio
training
> > > through running and cycling coupled with a 2X per week basic weight
training
> > > routine to maintain muscle mass. No aspirations of bodybuilding or
> > > powerlifting either.

> > > Comments?

> > > Thanks,

> > > Paul

 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by Jonathan Sydenha » Wed, 20 Feb 2002 01:15:52

You have got to be joking! I doubt if a bit of weight training will hurt
your running or vice versa - not at these levels. Run all you like and go on
toning up. OK, you won't be a champ bench presser but so what?
I find that now I'm getting into the high mileage phase of training for
London my ability to lift using the big muscle groups has dropped by about
15%. But I'm happy with that.The muslce is still there. And muscle is the
big fat burner!
Jonathan


Quote:
> So it's really not possible to look like
> the guys in the bowflex commercial (or even
> close to it) and run  miles 3-4 times a week.

> Man,

> I have been wasting my time lifting then...

> Im sure I get my MHR above 80% when I run too.

> I have been lifting for about 3 months now. I have been
> running 3 years.  I only do upper body stuff. I would just
> like to tone up my arms chest and back a little. I have made
> small noticeable gains, but not Iike I would expect when I used
> to lift years ago before I started running.

> Maybe I should cut back the running to 2 times a week.

> db



> > Catabolism refers to your body eating itself for fuel, for lack of a
> > more scientific way of saying it.  In the weights word, anabolism and
> > catabolism are the two opposites, gaining lean muscle mass and losing
> > it, respectively.

> > Aerobic exercise and also diets high in carbohydrates and low in protein
> > have been shown to be catabolic, which is why you don't see many
> > Schwartenegger-like physiques winning marathons.

> > -S-



> > > > Here is another question. It has been suggested on
> misc.fitness.weights that
> > > > excessive amounts of cardio and/or high intensity cardio (described
as
> 4-5
> > > > hours per week and/or sessions including 80% of max hr) will produce
a
> > > > catabolic effect whereby muscle tissue is actually broken down. Has
> anyone
> > > > on this list any knowledge of this or is it b.s.? I am not talking
> about

> > > Catabolic effect? I'm not familiar with this term.

> > > But my basic knowledge of running (and for that matter any exercise)
is
> that
> > > every time you do a physical activity muscle fibers are broken.
Imagine
> you are
> > > stretching hundereds of *** bands, a few will break but most won't.

> > > The good news is that unlike *** bands muscles repair themselves.
In
> fact
> > > this is how people get stronger, faster and so on. Muscles fibers that
> are
> > > broken repair them better than before. This process also adds miles of
> ***
> > > capalaries to increas *** flow to the area that is being used.

> > > I don't know the exact numbers for when muscles break down, it has to
be
> vastly
> > > different for individuals. But any combined effect of intensity and
time
> can
> > > trigger this effect in me. That muscle soreness you experience after a
> workout
> > > or run is your body repairing itself.

> > > Answer, it isn't bs.

> > > Andy

> > > > running marathons but a simple weekly regimen of effective cardio
> training
> > > > through running and cycling coupled with a 2X per week basic weight
> training
> > > > routine to maintain muscle mass. No aspirations of bodybuilding or
> > > > powerlifting either.

> > > > Comments?

> > > > Thanks,

> > > > Paul

 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by amh » Wed, 20 Feb 2002 01:15:50

Quote:

> Catabolism refers to your body eating itself for fuel, for lack of a
> more scientific way of saying it.  In the weights word, anabolism and
> catabolism are the two opposites, gaining lean muscle mass and losing
> it, respectively.

Thanks for the definition. I'd imagine that catabolism is pretty severe and extreme.
I've heard of this happening during survival situations but not in normal every day
running. Got to imagine it isn't very common.

Quote:

> Aerobic exercise and also diets high in carbohydrates and low in protein
> have been shown to be catabolic, which is why you don't see many
> Schwartenegger-like physiques winning marathons.

I always thought it was because of their conflicting film acting schedules?

Thanks,
Andy

 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by Andrew T Has » Wed, 20 Feb 2002 04:02:21

Quote:

> I agree with Steve. I very rarely post there, but much of the stuff on
> misc.fitness.weights is not bs.  What is BS is the stuff Jeff posted in this
> thread.

--The original question is will it break it down, not if you can get buffed
and be a runner.  Yes, if you run a lot, muscles you don't use a lot (ie arms
for most runners) will shrink.  If you run even more, muscles you do use a lot
(ie quads, gluts, hammys) will also shrink though their overall strength may
actually increase.  I run up to 80 mpw and lift as well, and am able to more
than maintain my strength and size.  My rate of strength/size increase is a
lot less than that which I see during off-training periods, but by no means
zero.  The complex biochemistry of the body is not an all-or-nothing switch
between catabolic and anabolic.  Endurance training and strength training
are by no means "unmixable", but endurance training will definitely decrease
your strength/size gains.  However I don't believe you will lose strength or
a lot of size if you weight train properly.
Andy Hass
 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by Steve Freide » Wed, 20 Feb 2002 05:56:25

Jonathan is absolutely correct.  Keep on doing both.  He and I are
saying the same thing here.

As someone who has been down this road, I advise separating running and
lifting by as much time as you can in order to maximize your experience
in both.  Do them on separate days if at all possible.

The guy in the Bowflex commercial looks like that because he's very
lean, and being that lean is largely a matter of consuming fewer
calories and not much else.

-S-

Quote:

> So it's really not possible to look like
> the guys in the bowflex commercial (or even
> close to it) and run  miles 3-4 times a week.

> Man,

> I have been wasting my time lifting then...

> Im sure I get my MHR above 80% when I run too.

> I have been lifting for about 3 months now. I have been
> running 3 years.  I only do upper body stuff. I would just
> like to tone up my arms chest and back a little. I have made
> small noticeable gains, but not Iike I would expect when I used
> to lift years ago before I started running.

> Maybe I should cut back the running to 2 times a week.

> db



> > Catabolism refers to your body eating itself for fuel, for lack of a
> > more scientific way of saying it.  In the weights word, anabolism and
> > catabolism are the two opposites, gaining lean muscle mass and losing
> > it, respectively.

> > Aerobic exercise and also diets high in carbohydrates and low in protein
> > have been shown to be catabolic, which is why you don't see many
> > Schwartenegger-like physiques winning marathons.

> > -S-



> > > > Here is another question. It has been suggested on
> misc.fitness.weights that
> > > > excessive amounts of cardio and/or high intensity cardio (described as
> 4-5
> > > > hours per week and/or sessions including 80% of max hr) will produce a
> > > > catabolic effect whereby muscle tissue is actually broken down. Has
> anyone
> > > > on this list any knowledge of this or is it b.s.? I am not talking
> about

> > > Catabolic effect? I'm not familiar with this term.

> > > But my basic knowledge of running (and for that matter any exercise) is
> that
> > > every time you do a physical activity muscle fibers are broken. Imagine
> you are
> > > stretching hundereds of *** bands, a few will break but most won't.

> > > The good news is that unlike *** bands muscles repair themselves. In
> fact
> > > this is how people get stronger, faster and so on. Muscles fibers that
> are
> > > broken repair them better than before. This process also adds miles of
> ***
> > > capalaries to increas *** flow to the area that is being used.

> > > I don't know the exact numbers for when muscles break down, it has to be
> vastly
> > > different for individuals. But any combined effect of intensity and time
> can
> > > trigger this effect in me. That muscle soreness you experience after a
> workout
> > > or run is your body repairing itself.

> > > Answer, it isn't bs.

> > > Andy

> > > > running marathons but a simple weekly regimen of effective cardio
> training
> > > > through running and cycling coupled with a 2X per week basic weight
> training
> > > > routine to maintain muscle mass. No aspirations of bodybuilding or
> > > > powerlifting either.

> > > > Comments?

> > > > Thanks,

> > > > Paul

 
 
 

Cardio and weight training

Post by Paul Gros » Wed, 20 Feb 2002 06:04:29

Once again, thanks to all who weighed in on my original post. In my case I
will do some experimentation but it doesn't sound as though my efforts at
cardio (which are pretty modest) will have any negative effect on my weight
training (which is also pretty modest).

Paul