Running hooker

Running hooker

Post by Michell » Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:24:57


Only in Vegas!

<http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/suzy-favor-hamilton-136952>

<http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=4963763>

--
Tea Party Patriots is to Patriotism as
People's Democratic Republic is to Democracy.

 
 
 

Running hooker

Post by John Hurle » Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:00:23

Michelle:

# Only in Vegas!

She is a much better runner than almost anyone else.

People make bad decisions all the time.

No shortage of much less talented people selling themselves for much
less.

Easy to throw stones?

 
 
 

Running hooker

Post by Michell » Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:00:24

In article


Quote:
> Michelle:

> # Only in Vegas!

> She is a much better runner than almost anyone else.

> People make bad decisions all the time.

> No shortage of much less talented people selling themselves for much
> less.

> Easy to throw stones?

I'm not throwing stones; she has nothing to be ashamed about.

--
Tea Party Patriots is to Patriotism as
People's Democratic Republic is to Democracy.

 
 
 

Running hooker

Post by John Hurle » Mon, 24 Dec 2012 23:08:30

Michelle:

# I'm not throwing stones; she has nothing to be ashamed about.

Choosing to use the word "***" seems to be a very strange choice
then for your subject line.

 
 
 

Running hooker

Post by Michell » Tue, 25 Dec 2012 00:53:11

In article


Quote:
> Michelle:

> # I'm not throwing stones; she has nothing to be ashamed about.

> Choosing to use the word "***" seems to be a very strange choice then
> for your subject line.

I don't consider "***" to be a disparaging term.  A very good friend of
mine said about herself, "I used to be a ***, but I was never a ***.  
I didn't charge quite enough, though, to label myself a courtesan."

--
Tea Party Patriots is to Patriotism as
People's Democratic Republic is to Democracy.

 
 
 

Running hooker

Post by Doug Frees » Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:12:17


In article

Quote:

> Michelle:

> # I'm not throwing stones; she has nothing to be ashamed about.

> Choosing to use the word "***" seems to be a very strange choice then
> for your subject line.

#I don't consider "***" to be a disparaging term.  A very good friend of
#mine said about herself, "I used to be a ***, but I was never a ***.
#I didn't charge quite enough, though, to label myself a courtesan."

There is a small set of people that make rugs using a frame and bits of
cloth and the process is called rug hooking and they proudly call themselves
***s but the only happy ending is a finished rug.

Some people consider the term *** a derogatory term but I'm not one of
those.  it's close in definition to *** which means sex for money.
It's one of the oldest professions alive. In many countries it is a valid
profession just like a plumber where they are married with children and is a
job. We have a few places in the US where it is legal and they pay taxes.
Just because money is exchanged the moralists claim it's ***.  *** has
more sleazy intonation where one partakes with  lots of partners cuz they
want to and many times fort free.

I much prefer the term Ho.

In any case call Susie what ever you want, I'll stand in line to get her
"autograph."

-D