Why do people think ending the roster split will fix WWE?

Why do people think ending the roster split will fix WWE?

Post by MikeMoto1.. » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:05:37


How's that going to fix the shitty product and the fact that I'll have
to see John Cena and Randy Orton twice a week instead of one?
 
 
 

Why do people think ending the roster split will fix WWE?

Post by Spung » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:02:41


Quote:
> How's that going to fix the shitty product and the fact that I'll have
> to see John Cena and Randy Orton twice a week instead of one?

Instantly doubles the talent roster on RAW and instantly doubles the talent
roster on Smackdown. Gives a ton more creative flexibility. And every
wrestler wouldn't be on both shows every week, so your Orton and Cena excuse
doesn't work either. Plus, it gives HHH one less way or burying people. How
many Batista posts have their been since his banishment to Siberia (a.k.a.
Smackdown)?

It was a stupid idea when the WWF talent roster was overloaded, and its an
even dumber idea now that it's talent roster is paper thin. It accomplishes
nothing other than 2 extra PPV's per year that suck. Did you enjoy last
nights Smackdown only PPV?