by North Sta » Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:46:53
By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
locally.
Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
by iBoatere » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:59:56
> For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
> compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
> Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
> By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
> for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
> locally.
> Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
> http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
by BAR » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:32:25
> In article <a65acc7a-e343-4744-9634-
> says...
> > For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
> > compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
> > Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
> > By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
> > for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
> > locally.
> > Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
> > http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
> Because somebody puts "truck category" tires on a vehicle, it's a truck,
> Suckling Don? Are you really that stupid? Do you know, by definition, a
> truck has a full frame under it? Do you know that your cute little RAV4
> is unibody construction? It's a car, idiot.
Unless it has a cab it isn't a truck.
by North Sta » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:58:38
> > In article <a65acc7a-e343-4744-9634-
> > says...
> > > For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
> > > compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
> > > Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
> > > By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
> > > for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
> > > locally.
> > > Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires ?size 225-65R-17
> > >http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
> > Because somebody puts "truck category" tires on a vehicle, it's a truck,
> > Suckling Don? Are you really that stupid? Do you know, by definition, a
> > truck has a full frame under it? Do you know that your cute little RAV4
> > is unibody construction? It's a car, idiot.
> The Toyota RAV4 and the Honda CR-V will never be trucks. You can mount
> truck tires on them, mount a 1" hitch, mount a winch, put a light bar
> across the top and what-ever other truck wanna-be equipment and they
> will still be chick cars.
> Unless it has a cab it isn't a truck.- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
by North Sta » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:00:46
> > For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
> > compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
> > Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
> > By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
> > for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
> > locally.
> > Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires ?size 225-65R-17
> >http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
> Because somebody puts "truck category" tires on a vehicle, it's a truck,
> Suckling Don? Are you really that stupid? Do you know, by definition, a
> truck has a full frame under it? Do you know that your cute little RAV4
> is unibody construction? It's a car, idiot.
by Drifte » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:20:49
> By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
> for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
> locally.
> Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
> http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
--
1-20-13 The end of an error
by North Sta » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:25:56
> > For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
> > compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
> > Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
> > By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
> > for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
> > locally.
> > Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires ?size 225-65R-17
> >http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
> At least one uninformed writer agrees with you. Good find Donny. I
> seriously hope you are thinking of trading your POS Rave-4 for a CRV..
> --
> 1-20-13 The end of an error
by Drifte » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:32:50
>>> For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
>>> compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
>>> Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
>>> By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
>>> for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
>>> locally.
>>> Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
>>> http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
>> At least one uninformed writer agrees with you. Good find Donny. I
>> seriously hope you are thinking of trading your POS Rave-4 for a CRV..
>> --
>> 1-20-13 The end of an error
> Comsumer Reports has the RAV4 on top of the heap in the compact SUV
> catagory, O' Stinky One.
> When you need advice on your next vehicle purchase, just ask me.
--
1-20-13 The end of an error
by Drifte » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:40:14
>>>> For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
>>>> compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
>>>> Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
>>>> By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
>>>> for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
>>>> locally.
>>>> Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
>>>> http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
>>> At least one uninformed writer agrees with you. Good find Donny. I
>>> seriously hope you are thinking of trading your POS Rave-4 for a CRV..
>>> --
>>> 1-20-13 The end of an error
>> Comsumer Reports has the RAV4 on top of the heap in the compact SUV
>> catagory, O' Stinky One.
>> When you need advice on your next vehicle purchase, just ask me.
> When My wife needs a new car I'll certainly consider your experience
> with and knowledge of girly cars.
--
1-20-13 The end of an error
by Canuck5 » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 06:50:29
>> For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
>> compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
>> Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
>> By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
>> for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
>> locally.
>> Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
>> http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
> Because somebody puts "truck category" tires on a vehicle, it's a truck,
> Suckling Don? Are you really that stupid? Do you know, by definition, a
> truck has a full frame under it? Do you know that your cute little RAV4
> is unibody construction? It's a car, idiot.
But I don't like it as a truck.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.
by Honey Badge » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:08:58
>>> In article<a65acc7a-e343-4744-9634-
>>> says...
>>>> For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
>>>> compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
>>>> Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
>>>> By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
>>>> for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
>>>> locally.
>>>> Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
>>>> http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
>>> Because somebody puts "truck category" tires on a vehicle, it's a truck,
>>> Suckling Don? Are you really that stupid? Do you know, by definition, a
>>> truck has a full frame under it? Do you know that your cute little RAV4
>>> is unibody construction? It's a car, idiot.
>> The Toyota RAV4 and the Honda CR-V will never be trucks. You can mount
>> truck tires on them, mount a 1" hitch, mount a winch, put a light bar
>> across the top and what-ever other truck wanna-be equipment and they
>> will still be chick cars.
>> Unless it has a cab it isn't a truck.- Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
> Duh!
> The article about the new Honda CRV refered to them as 'trucks'...
> irregardless of what tires are recommended for it.
> BTW... I have a 2" hitch mounted... just like all the normal pickups.
-HB
by JustWai » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:59:48
>>>> In article<a65acc7a-e343-4744-9634-
>>>> says...
>>>>> For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
>>>>> compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
>>>>> Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
>>>>> By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
>>>>> for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
>>>>> locally.
>>>>> Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
>>>>> http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
>>>> Because somebody puts "truck category" tires on a vehicle, it's a
>>>> truck,
>>>> Suckling Don? Are you really that stupid? Do you know, by definition, a
>>>> truck has a full frame under it? Do you know that your cute little RAV4
>>>> is unibody construction? It's a car, idiot.
>>> The Toyota RAV4 and the Honda CR-V will never be trucks. You can mount
>>> truck tires on them, mount a 1" hitch, mount a winch, put a light bar
>>> across the top and what-ever other truck wanna-be equipment and they
>>> will still be chick cars.
>>> Unless it has a cab it isn't a truck.- Hide quoted text -
>>> - Show quoted text -
>> Duh!
>> The article about the new Honda CRV refered to them as 'trucks'...
>> irregardless of what tires are recommended for it.
>> BTW... I have a 2" hitch mounted... just like all the normal pickups.
> "irregardless"? From the Usenet typo Queen? Amazing!
> -HB
by Califbil » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:01:33
> > In article <a65acc7a-e343-4744-9634-
> > says...
> > > For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
> > > compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
> > > Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
> > > By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
> > > for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
> > > locally.
> > > Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
> > >http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
> > Because somebody puts "truck category" tires on a vehicle, it's a truck,
> > Suckling Don? Are you really that stupid? Do you know, by definition, a
> > truck has a full frame under it? Do you know that your cute little RAV4
> > is unibody construction? It's a car, idiot.
> The Toyota RAV4 and the Honda CR-V will never be trucks. You can mount
> truck tires on them, mount a 1" hitch, mount a winch, put a light bar
> across the top and what-ever other truck wanna-be equipment and they
> will still be chick cars.
> Unless it has a cab it isn't a truck.- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2" hitch does not make a truck. My wife's Venza has a 2" receiver hitch
installed. So we can install the bike rack. Not a tow plug installed as it
is not a truck. Doubt if the car is rated to tow much and is probably a
lot more powerful than a RAV4. I own a truck also. A very nice upscale
crew cab diesel truck, but is has a 15000# tow rating. Leather etc, but
will never be a car.
by Califbil » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:03:30
> > For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
> > compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
> > Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
> > By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
> > for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
> > locally.
> > Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
> >http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
> Because somebody puts "truck category" tires on a vehicle, it's a truck,
> Suckling Don? Are you really that stupid? Do you know, by definition, a
> truck has a full frame under it? Do you know that your cute little RAV4
> is unibody construction? It's a car, idiot.
-------------------------------------------------------------
How much did Honda pay for that fib? No little sport bed station wagon will
ever be top of the line pickup.
by iBoatere » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:47:54
> > In article <a65acc7a-e343-4744-9634-
> > says...
> > > For the dummies in here who keep insisting that the RAV4 and it's
> > > compact SUV catagory are not 'trucks'.
> > > Read the 3rd paragraph re the new Honda CRV.
> > > By the way... just ordered a set of 'TRUCK' catagory all season tires
> > > for my RAV4 as recommended by at least three different suppliers
> > > locally.
> > > Michelin Latitude Touring all season tires size 225-65R-17
> > >http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsnews/33829-first-drive-all-new-cr-v
> > Because somebody puts "truck category" tires on a vehicle, it's a truck,
> > Suckling Don? Are you really that stupid? Do you know, by definition, a
> > truck has a full frame under it? Do you know that your cute little RAV4
> > is unibody construction? It's a car, idiot.
> What a jackass.
> Maybe you should check out the Honda Ridgeline.
> A unibody pickup that is rated at the top of the pickup catagory by
> Consumer Reports.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> How much did Honda pay for that fib? No little sport bed station wagon will
> ever be top of the line pickup.
1. Experience with building Glen-L's 'Kingfisher' or 'Play Pen' ?
2. OT Bush's 'sacrifice' can't be matched
3. Woods designs 'Pixie' and 'Quattro' catamarans
4. Kayak-polo/''canoe''-polo/kano-polo
5. '' Rudy myers extreme guide''
6. '' Tragic Deaths Illinois River south Ore''
7. 'It's Floodin' Down in Texas'
8. 'Alcone' Wins 'Canadian Classics Offshore Challenge'
9. Kerry's 'facts' just don't add up
10. Obama 'Favorables' Highest in 28 Years, Palin 'tanks'
11. It just gets 'worser' and 'worser'!
12. ''Are these guys really that radical''?