WHO's THE BEST 14's

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by gregn » Sat, 20 Jul 2002 15:51:49


It looks like a majority of California teams are looking for players
for nationals. OC Storm, Sharks, Cruisers, Puma's, Cal Lite, had to go
out of state to qualify? Are these teams any good? How about them
Angel's, Athletic's, and Desperados; Angel's have eight players and
need five more; do Desperados have any decent coaches; have the
Athletics ever won anything, their uniforms seem to look sharp, but,
can they win the B-I-G O-N-E? Who the HELL are the AZTECS? Montezuma
rings a bell. Is that Marty coach loud enough, he sure was in Tuscon?
Minor's and Renegades must be on their way to steamboat.

And, whatever happened to that coach Knuckleknocker?  Guess, he went
into hiding when his team didn't qualify.

 
 
 

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by FstPtchm » Sat, 20 Jul 2002 17:36:18

My, what a positive and upbeat post.  Your post asks "Who's the Best 14's"
however, it appears that none rise to the occasion in your book.  Have a nice
day.

It looks like a majority of California teams are looking for players

Quote:
>for nationals. OC Storm, Sharks, Cruisers, Puma's, Cal Lite, had to go
>out of state to qualify? Are these teams any good? How about them
>Angel's, Athletic's, and Desperados; Angel's have eight players and
>need five more; do Desperados have any decent coaches; have the
>Athletics ever won anything, their uniforms seem to look sharp, but,
>can they win the B-I-G O-N-E? Who the HELL are the AZTECS? Montezuma
>rings a bell. Is that Marty coach loud enough, he sure was in Tuscon?
>Minor's and Renegades must be on their way to steamboat.

>And, whatever happened to that coach Knuckleknocker?  Guess, he went
>into hiding when his team didn't qualify.


 
 
 

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by Bill Smi » Sat, 20 Jul 2002 22:32:00

Quote:
>>> It looks like a majority of California teams are looking for players for

nationals. OC Storm, Sharks, Cruisers, Puma's, Cal Lite, had to go out of state
to qualify? Are these teams any good? How about them Angel's, Athletic's, and
Desperados; Angel's have eight players and need five more; do Desperados have
any decent coaches; have the Athletics ever won anything, their uniforms seem
to look sharp, but, can they win the B-I-G O-N-E? Who the HELL are the AZTECS?
Montezuma rings a bell. Is that Marty coach loud enough, he sure was in Tuscon?
Minor's and Renegades must be on their way to steamboat. <<<

In the best American tradition, sour apples make the best pies. Congratulations
on contributing to our heritage!

Quote:
>>> And, whatever happened to that coach Knuckleknocker?  Guess, he went into

hiding when his team didn't qualify. <<<

Heard he went out-of-state as well, writing material for  Letterman back there
in Noo Yawk City.

Bill Smith
Burlingame, CA

 
 
 

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by Agnt21 » Sun, 21 Jul 2002 04:51:12

have the

Quote:
>Athletics ever won anything, their uniforms seem to look sharp, but,
>can they win the B-I-G O-N-E?

Good coaches and good players.  I like their chances.
 
 
 

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by Andy » Sun, 21 Jul 2002 08:09:50

Both San Diego Renegade 14&U teams are going to Western Zone.
Quote:

> It looks like a majority of California teams are looking for players
> for nationals. OC Storm, Sharks, Cruisers, Puma's, Cal Lite, had to go

> out of state to qualify? Are these teams any good? How about them
> Angel's, Athletic's, and Desperados; Angel's have eight players and
> need five more; do Desperados have any decent coaches; have the
> Athletics ever won anything, their uniforms seem to look sharp, but,
> can they win the B-I-G O-N-E? Who the HELL are the AZTECS? Montezuma
> rings a bell. Is that Marty coach loud enough, he sure was in Tuscon?
> Minor's and Renegades must be on their way to steamboat.

> And, whatever happened to that coach Knuckleknocker?  Guess, he went
> into hiding when his team didn't qualify.

 
 
 

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by Jack olson I » Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:13:21

You forgot one great team....how about southern cal's Ballistics!!?? They went
to Sacramento and just missed in qualifying.
You better watch out for the "long shot" Look what "War Emblem" did in the
Kentucky Derby!!!
 
 
 

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by Bartholomew Marl » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 05:07:21

Quote:
> And, whatever happened to that coach Knuckleknocker?  Guess, he went
> into hiding when his team didn't qualify.

LOL! I love it when wannabe Californians get brave and talk smack to
those of us coaching and playing the real thing.

We purchased a team that is attending... so we will be there! Ten
grand was a good deal when you consider what other teams have spent to
qualify.

Will YOU be there?

It'll be hot in Georgia but if you draw us, your players will be
fanned.

 
 
 

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by MentalTossFlycoo » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 07:13:48


Quote:
> > And, whatever happened to that coach Knuckleknocker?  Guess, he went
> > into hiding when his team didn't qualify.

> LOL! I love it when wannabe Californians get brave and talk smack to
> those of us coaching and playing the real thing.

> We purchased a team that is attending... so we will be there! Ten
> grand was a good deal when you consider what other teams have spent to
> qualify.

> Will YOU be there?

> It'll be hot in Georgia but if you draw us, your players will be
> fanned.

You dopes bragging on your 14 year olds crack me up.  Living vicariously
through your little kids is pathetic.
 
 
 

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by Bartholomew Marl » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 03:29:52

Quote:
> You dopes bragging on your 14 year olds crack me up.  Living vicariously
> through your little kids is pathetic.

HAH! I do not do dope and I have no idea what Viagra (you spelled it
wrong!) has to do with the topic of this conversation. I realize you
easterners are envious of So Cal teams, but stooping to accusations
about legal and illegal *** is low. Our girls and most of our
coaches play fair and would pass ANY drug screen with flying colors.

Besides, you really need to get a clue. Viagra will not help you to
play this game any better. Also, people who use performance enhancing
*** DO NOT usually brag about it. I mean, REALLY, if you're going to
make wild accusations, at least make them believable.

In any case, I do agree that using dope is pathetic!

 
 
 

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by MentalTossFlycoo » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 06:36:33


Quote:
> > You dopes bragging on your 14 year olds crack me up.  Living vicariously
> > through your little kids is pathetic.

> HAH! I do not do dope and I have no idea what Viagra (you spelled it
> wrong!) has to do with the topic of this conversation. I realize you
> easterners are envious of So Cal teams, but stooping to accusations
> about legal and illegal *** is low. Our girls and most of our
> coaches play fair and would pass ANY drug screen with flying colors.

> Besides, you really need to get a clue. Viagra will not help you to
> play this game any better. Also, people who use performance enhancing
> *** DO NOT usually brag about it. I mean, REALLY, if you're going to
> make wild accusations, at least make them believable.

> In any case, I do agree that using dope is pathetic!

I hope your response was a feeble attempt at humor.  If not.....feel free to
smoke as much dope as you can get your hands on.  You can't get any
stupider.
 
 
 

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by Ji » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:00:53

Can I suggest a truce?

There are a number of 14U players that read RSS especially when the
thread is "Who's the best 14's".

Satire is enjoyed by all of us but *** especially viagra are a bit
out of line. I will propose the original topic for the 14U players to
read.

Who are the best 14's? USA A's? Desperados? Explosion? Angels? Pumas?
Thunder? Force? Storm? There are a few of the California teams to
start with, how do they stack up with teams from other states?
Bandits? T-Birds? T.E. Elite? Patriots? Lil Saints? Vancover Ford?

Can anyone put some of those in order? I am sure there are many good
teams not mentioned.

Jim

 
 
 

WHO's THE BEST 14's

Post by Bartholomew Marl » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 23:52:38

Quote:

> There are a number of 14U players that read RSS especially when the
> thread is "Who's the best 14's".

> Satire is enjoyed by all of us but *** especially viagra are a bit
> out of line.

Yes they are, but picking on me really won't change the negative
message being sent to our nation's youth. THAT message is going out
day after day, hour after hour and minute after minute like a broken
record.

The bottom line is that *** and other distasteful subjects ARE the
topic of conversation. OUR kids ARE hearing about it EVERY day.

My message and the one NOT being broadcast enough, is that they suck.

Your message is pretty much the same as mine, but you have the wrong
target. I suggest that you direct your comments to the radio and
television stations, drug companies, recording artists, film producers
and drug abusing professional athletes and those who pay their wages.

Quote:
> Who are the best 14's? USA A's? Desperados? Explosion? Angels? Pumas?
> Thunder? Force? Storm? There are a few of the California teams to
> start with, how do they stack up with teams from other states?
> Bandits? T-Birds? T.E. Elite? Patriots? Lil Saints? Vancover Ford?

> Can anyone put some of those in order? I am sure there are many good
> teams not mentioned.

Your question seems to assume that "best" is measured by the win loss
column or big tournament victories. Personally, I think that such a
measurement is a bit premature for girls who are still thir*** or
four*** years old. Out there somewhere, (on obscure teams that we
don't talk about) are athletes who have not yet peaked and won't
likely peak for some time.

The "best" teams are those that keep these young athletes interested
in the game. Some are among those that you have mentioned. Some exist
in obscurity in out of way communities that you and I have never heard
of.