Quote:
> Question 1. If Paris St Germain had lost to London Broncos (as they should
> have done, I am sure the match was a set up) and ended up bottom of Super
> League, would Maurice Lindsay et al have allowed them to be relegated?
No, and quite rightly so. European league needs PSG and other
expansion sides a hell of a lot more than it needs another side from the
north of England. To relegate PSG, London or in future South Wales would
be a step backwards.
Quote:
> Question 2. If Workington Town end up bottom of Super League, will Maurice
> Lindsay et al allow them to be relegated?
> What do you think?
Probably, but I'd have a reservation about it. Workington aren't a
north England side in the sense that they aren't in the same pack as most
of the clubs which are clustered in the area around Leeds. That area
probably only needs four (maybe five) clubs - say Leeds, Sheffield,
Manchester, Hull and/or Liverpool. In the far north keep either Workington
or instead bring in Newcastle or have both. All the other clubs should be
from expansion areas IMO (eg. London [*2?], South Wales, PSG, Birmingham,
Bordeaux, Lyon, Dublin etc.)
Obviously the questions were asked to point out the inequity, but
equity is never going to get the comp anywhere but rather just leave it
sitting in the same place it has for 101 years. With Union now
professional this is a situation that league can't afford. Hence some
inequity to get a comp that covers the most market and is more marketable.
Painful, but neccessary.
Catchya round, Leigh
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Leigh T. Gillespie * "It takes leather balls *
* Phone - Australia (077) 791219 * to play Rugby!" *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *