by laurence turle » Thu, 11 Jan 1996 04:00:00
by John Lancast » Thu, 11 Jan 1996 04:00:00
Who exactly on the comitee of the RL, is qualified to argue with a
doctors opinion. Or, are they saying the doctor lied.
Good job its not the states !!!
John Lancaster
St Helens, Merseyside, UK
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_lancaster
by J. Charno » Fri, 12 Jan 1996 04:00:00
Maybe it does seem unfair on Saints to be fined for fielding an extremely
weakened side against Wigan in a match they didn't care about, but the
medical certificates don't really mean much. Nobody could believe that
they wouldn't have fielded a much stronger side if they had been in with
a chance of the Championship. I thhink that they got off lightly with a
fine of 10,000 pounds, especially as they only have to pay half, with the
other half suspended. Ironically they needn't have bothered saving their
best players for the Warrington semi-final - they could have won that game
fielding their tea-ladies.
John Charnock
by John Lancast » Fri, 12 Jan 1996 04:00:00
>Maybe it does seem unfair on Saints to be fined for fielding an extremely
>weakened side against Wigan in a match they didn't care about, but the
>medical certificates don't really mean much.
>John Charnock
I Know it was a load off bull, what I am asking is who is qualified to
question medical opinion on the panel ?
John Lancaster
St Helens, Merseyside, UK
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_lancaster
by Paul McNall » Fri, 12 Jan 1996 04:00:00
>Who exactly on the comitee of the RL, is qualified to argue with a
>doctors opinion. Or, are they saying the doctor lied.