Sport Today

by **Paul Matthe** » Tue, 15 Apr 1997 04:00:00

The weekends close results in SL can only bee good for the game. Most games
were very close this week. I only hope that continues. Close results can only
be good for the game as a whole. The biggest surprise was that Warrington dealt
out the biggest win margin.

What does everyone else think?

Paul Matthews
http://www.triton.u-net.com

by **Paul McNal** » Tue, 15 Apr 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

>The weekends close results in SL can only bee good for the game. Most games
>were very close this week. I only hope that continues. Close results can only
>be good for the game as a whole. The biggest surprise was that Warrington dealt
>out the biggest win margin.

>What does everyone else think?

>Paul Matthews
>http://www.triton.u-net.com

It was a good round, only problem is Castleford who really have got
some problems..

Paul

by **Steve Morri** » Tue, 15 Apr 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

>The weekends close results in SL can only bee good for the game. Most games
>were very close this week. I only hope that continues. Close results can only
>be good for the game as a whole. The biggest surprise was that Warrington dealt
>out the biggest win margin.

>What does everyone else think?

>Paul Matthews
>http://www.triton.u-net.com

It sickens me to darw at Fax but you have to be right.

50 - 0 helps no one, I'm all for a more competitive SL even if it
decreases London's chances of winning. Lets hope we save something for
the Aussies

--
Steve Morris

by **Pete Kolto** » Tue, 15 Apr 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

> The weekends close results in SL can only bee good for the game. Most
games
> were very close this week. I only hope that continues. Close results can
only
> be good for the game as a whole. The biggest surprise was that Warrington
dealt
> out the biggest win margin.

> What does everyone else think?

Isn't this what SL wa supposed to be all about. Put money into the game so
all the clubs can afford decent players and get more even contests instead
of one or two teams who can afford the best players running away with all
the prizes (except for Leeds who could afford all the best players but
still won *** all!).

by **Steve Morri** » Wed, 16 Apr 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

>On Mon, 14 Apr 1997 14:52:22 +0100, Steve Morris

>>>The weekends close results in SL can only bee good for the game. Most games
>>>were very close this week. I only hope that continues. Close results can only
>>>be good for the game as a whole. The biggest surprise was that Warrington
>dealt
>>>out the biggest win margin.

>>>What does everyone else think?

>Brilliant !

> After Saints winning last years comps, I am now totally cool about
>the sport and the outcome of matches. Its as if its a monkey off my
>back, and whilst I WANT Saints to win it all again, if they give it
>their best and dont win, hey, I can live with it.

>Also, watching Wigans demise, if that isnt a lesson to everyone about
>not getting***ey and big headed, nothing is.

>I did not enjoy last season one bit. I enjoyed the day after the cup
>final and the day after winning the league. The stress I felt during
>some games, and I do mean stress, was not nice.

>If thats what the London and particularly the Bulls fans are feeling
>now, I genuinly pity you.

Now too early for all that I get grumpy for a couple of hours when we
play poorly or loose but nothing too painful

Quote:

>Heres to some great sport this season. Lets hope Robbie Paul gets a
>full game for New Zealand too. He deserve the recognition as his
>brother is in, and IMHO, Robbies better.

>John Lancaster
>St Helens, UK

Different players, can't wait to see him play against the aussies. I
have put my rep on Saints and Bulls being able to give the Aussies a
decent game.

--
Steve Morris

by **Lloyd Barkha** » Wed, 16 Apr 1997 04:00:00

Pete Kolton wrote on 14/4/97:

Quote:

>> The weekends close results in SL can only bee good for the game. Most
games
>> were very close this week. I only hope that continues. Close results can
only
>> be good for the game as a whole. The biggest surprise was that Warrington
dealt
>> out the biggest win margin.

>> What does everyone else think?

>Isn't this what SL wa supposed to be all about. Put money into the game so
>all the clubs can afford decent players and get more even contests instead
>of one or two teams who can afford the best players running away with all
>the prizes (except for Leeds who could afford all the best players but
>still won *** all!).

Haven't we had this conversation before. Why don't you try and think of something
original to say about Leeds or is this too difficult for a Shark. Mind you they do say
that compared to it's size a Shark's brain is tiny. Nuff said.

Lloyd

by **<a..** » Wed, 16 Apr 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

>> What does everyone else think?

I think I'm f****d in the Tipster's competition. Wrong. I know I'm
f****d.
However, I think the weekend just gone has to be one of the best adverts
for the game for a long time - one draw, three won on drop-goals, one
won by a single try, shame about Cas. Suddenly SL is wide-open and
fascinating. Lets have loads more of the same, except at the Stoop on
Friday...
--
Andy Dawson

by **Steve Morri** » Thu, 17 Apr 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

>On Tue, 15 Apr 1997 10:04:13 +0100, Steve Morris

>>Different players, can't wait to see him play against the aussies. I
>>have put my rep on Saints and Bulls being able to give the Aussies a
>>decent game.

>Do you mean Saints v Ausies, Bulls v Aussies, Or do you mean Saints
>and Bulls v Aussies. The latter would do OK.

>PS - Saints have beat London and Paris away, so thats quite a few
>Aussies put to the sword already me thinks. Surely there is no one
>coming over who is better than Pete Gill, eh Steve ??

>John Lancaster
>St Helens, UK

Gill is but one man.

Out for two games and we loose one and draw the other

--
Steve Morris

by **Paul McNal** » Thu, 17 Apr 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

>Saints have just managed to beat Salford at Knowsley Rd.
>This could be one hell of a season.
> Well played both Reds and Saints.

>John Lancaster
>St Helens, UK

It was a good game wasn't, did ya get there?

Paul

by **David Birtwisl** » Thu, 17 Apr 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

>The weekends close results in SL can only bee good for the game. Most games
>were very close this week. I only hope that continues. Close results can only
>be good for the game as a whole. The biggest surprise was that Warrington dealt
>out the biggest win margin.

>What does everyone else think?

Could the fact that we are enjoying good competitive games at the moment
have anything to do with ref Cummins (sp?) leading the way by making
sure both teams play by the rules, cleaning up the play the balls, and
being fair to both sides?

The last game he reffed which was on Sky was really good to watch.
Connolly also seems to be doing well at the moment. Even Smith had a
better grip the last game. Keep it up referees.

Quote:

>Paul Matthews
>http://www.triton.u-net.com

--
David Birtwisle

by **Pete Kolto** » Sun, 20 Apr 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

> Haven't we had this conversation before. Why don't you try and think of
something
> original to say about Leeds or is this too difficult for a Shark. Mind
you they do say
> that compared to it's size a Shark's brain is tiny. Nuff said.

We have had this conversation before and will no doubt have it again when
the subject of a club's ability to buy the best players comes up again.

BTW, did you know that if you're being charged at by a rhino all you have
to do is stay out of it's way for a few seconds, not difficult as it only
sees what's directly in front of it, and then it will forget what it was
chasing!! Sounds about right!

Sport Today

Results comments

Results comments

Results comments

Results comments

Results comments

Results comments

Results comments

Results comments

Results comments

Results comments

Results comments

Results comments