>>> As for Penrith, I didn't rate them much. I don't know if they're a quick
>>> side by Aus' standards but that and Bradford's handling errors were the
>>> telling factors. If ball hadn't gone to ground, which it always will with
>>> Bradford's style of play, Bradford could have had 30 unanswered points on
>>> the board by half time. Penrith pounced (cat like?) on the loose ball and
>>> it was a try at the other end. Bradford have no one with pace. Simple as
>>> In short, Penrith were less trouble than Oldham in the first half. In the
>>> second half Dewsbury Miner's Welfare would have beaten Bradford.
>>So, what you are trying to say is,(while choked to the max)that Bradford
>>lost the game Penrith didn't win the game.
>>I have heard a similar load of bollocks from every other losing teams
>>fan.IF,IF.IF my aunty had balls she would be an uncle.
>>If Bradford had won "BRING ON THE NEXT LOSERS WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS"
>>Next, Penrith will be a bunch of ***ers for not winning by more.
>>Royce Simmons knows which buttons to push,the second half showed that.
>You mate, are a right ***.
>And I think I speak for everyone!
Sorry for changing the thread, but there seems to be
a few of them about since the WCC started.
Their main characteristic, apart from the obvious,
seems to be, to watch a game with their eyes