Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Pauli » Thu, 03 Jun 2004 12:15:53


Heard today on the radio that the NFL does not want to put an
expansion team in LA, as they would rather move one of the three
following existing franchises:

1) New Orleans
2) San Diego
3) Indianapolis

Discuss.

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Daniel Serif » Thu, 03 Jun 2004 12:28:38

On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 22:15:53 -0500, Pauli G wrote

Quote:
> Heard today on the radio that the NFL does not want to put an
> expansion team in LA, as they would rather move one of the three
> following existing franchises:

> 1) New Orleans
> 2) San Diego
> 3) Indianapolis

> Discuss.

It's probably better that way. 33 teams doesn't make much sense.

The Colts are probably the best choice for the move.

--
Daniel Seriff

Honey, those aren't children, they're packets of creamcheese.

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Jefferson N. Glapsk » Thu, 03 Jun 2004 12:22:03


Quote:
> Heard today on the radio that the NFL does not want to put an
> expansion team in LA, as they would rather move one of the three
> following existing franchises:

> 1) New Orleans
> 2) San Diego
> 3) Indianapolis

> Discuss.

*** LA.

Jefferson

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Scott I. Ferrel » Thu, 03 Jun 2004 12:55:20

Quote:

> Heard today on the radio that the NFL does not want to put an
> expansion team in LA, as they would rather move one of the three
> following existing franchises:

> 1) New Orleans
> 2) San Diego
> 3) Indianapolis

> Discuss.

San Diego is the easiest. the only place the Colts need to move to is
BACK to Baltimore (Ravens to LA?) and The Saints are likely the team
destined to go. The Superdome needs work, the state is in lousy
financial shape, and as the youngest of the three (I think) they'll get
the shaft.

Now the NFL should just forget LA. They've lost two teams already, and
no one really cares. Los Angelinos know that without the hometown team,
blackout rules are N/A.

Discussed.

SIF

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Geri and sometimes Bri » Thu, 03 Jun 2004 15:43:18

Quote:
>> Discuss.

>*** LA.

I live here and IAWTP.

~~Geri~~

.

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Jon Ensli » Thu, 03 Jun 2004 22:01:00

Quote:


>>Heard today on the radio that the NFL does not want to put an
>>expansion team in LA, as they would rather move one of the three
>>following existing franchises:

>>1) New Orleans
>>2) San Diego
>>3) Indianapolis

>>Discuss.

> San Diego is the easiest. the only place the Colts need to move to is
> BACK to Baltimore (Ravens to LA?)

Let it go.  Baltimore has a team that has actually been quite
successful...be happy.

Jon

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Jefferson N. Glapsk » Thu, 03 Jun 2004 22:13:04



Quote:
> >> Discuss.

> >*** LA.

> I live here and IAWTP.

Wow! I live here too.

Do you have any GIFS???

Jefferson

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Geri and sometimes Bri » Thu, 03 Jun 2004 23:38:42

Quote:
>> >*** LA.

>> I live here and IAWTP.

>Wow! I live here too.

>Do you have any GIFS???

No GIFs.  Do you?

~~Geri~~

.

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Jefferson N. Glapsk » Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:20:32



Quote:
> >> >*** LA.

> >> I live here and IAWTP.

> >Wow! I live here too.

> >Do you have any GIFS???

> No GIFs.  Do you?

Yes, but I'm a dude, so those GIFS are irrelevant.

Jefferson

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by dmd » Fri, 04 Jun 2004 01:31:24


Quote:


> >>Heard today on the radio that the NFL does not want to put an
> >>expansion team in LA, as they would rather move one of the three
> >>following existing franchises:

> >>1) New Orleans
> >>2) San Diego
> >>3) Indianapolis

> >>Discuss.

> > San Diego is the easiest. the only place the Colts need to move to is
> > BACK to Baltimore (Ravens to LA?)

> Let it go.  Baltimore has a team that has actually been quite
> successful...be happy.

God damn Art ***ing Modell...
 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Matthew Henni » Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:31:58



Quote:
> Heard today on the radio that the NFL does not want to put an
> expansion team in LA, as they would rather move one of the three
> following existing franchises:

> 1) New Orleans
> 2) San Diego
> 3) Indianapolis

> Discuss.

I thought you said there was football talk here.

MH

--
Ten of Spades
Aggee Fedayeen Chief
Supreme Ruler of the Obvious

"We just got outplayed today.  That's the bottom line.  And we got
outcoached."
  - OU Head Coach Bob Stoops following the Texas A&M game, Nov 9, 2002

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Carl Bank » Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:09:27

Pauli G,

Quote:
> Heard today on the radio that the NFL does not want to put an
> expansion team in LA, as they would rather move one of the three
> following existing franchises:

> 1) New Orleans
> 2) San Diego
> 3) Indianapolis

> Discuss.

New Orleans is already in LA, dumnass.

--
CARL BANKS        www.aerojockey.com

"Men who were in love had lower levels of the male sex hormone
testosterone -- linked to aggression and sex drive -- than other men,"
New Scientist magazine said Wednesday.
     _Falling in Love: A Gender-Bending Experience_, Reuters, May 6, 2004

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by lein » Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:28:06

Quote:



>> >> Discuss.

>> >*** LA.

>> I live here and IAWTP.

> Wow! I live here too.

> Do you have any GIFS???

Careful, you'll never know if it's Geri or Brian.

--
John Leinaweaver

 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Pauli » Fri, 04 Jun 2004 21:57:11

Quote:

> Pauli G,

> > Heard today on the radio that the NFL does not want to put an
> > expansion team in LA, as they would rather move one of the three
> > following existing franchises:

> > 1) New Orleans
> > 2) San Diego
> > 3) Indianapolis

> > Discuss.

> New Orleans is already in LA, dumnass.

That's very clever Senator.
 
 
 

Actual football talk (no babe rating, grill talk, movie reviews, or political rambling)

Post by Jon Fulbrig » Sat, 05 Jun 2004 02:06:56


Quote:
> >> Discuss.

> >*** LA.

> I live here and IAWTP.

> ~~Geri~~

Agreed.  I live a mile or two from the Rose Bowl and
the traffic is bad enough for the UCLA and Caltech games.  

jf