>But, you see, Chris, we will tell members what they will get. We just won't
>tell you. You are starting to sound like a broken record. We have addressed all
>your issues, including membership fees, sponsorship, contracts and the like for
>the last 6 months here and on various web sites. We have committed to virtually
>wipe the slate clean and put into writing whatever can be negotiated with the
>teams. So, then you call us liars.
You've adressed virtually none of my issues and committed to
nothing. You have four people and one website each giving a different
version of your "offer". As for telling members what they'll get,
again, the whole problem is you want members to sign first before they
know what they're getting. What's the big secret?
>Then, you and your 7 supporters - BCNB of Berry College, MPog of the USAF
>Academy, Airtech matrix of the University of Arizona, Ken Carter of Rutgers and
>xwolf13x, Legacy & MSpitz, all from Iowa State - just keep repeating the same
>old baseless accusations, over and over.
Those are some of the guys who post regularly on the NCPA web board
- but you forgot Dan Berowski of the twice national champion
University of Illinois, Karen Dunn of Purdue University, Ian Sherran
of University of Wisconsin - Whitewater and Daniel Mills of University
of Central Florida. Then you have the clubs who don't post but also
won't sign the USPL contract: Ohio State University, University of
Cincinatti, Arkansas State University, High Tech Institute, etc
(There are more, but I don't want to list anyone I havn't personally
spoken with recently). I may be the loud one here, but it's the
participants who are your problem.
>The endless bantering is not only a complete waste of time & effort, but I
>believe that is your sole objective. Then when we respond negatively after 6
>months of this type of frustrating dialogue, you say we are insulting you. And
>after we make changes and agree to rewrite the contract and you lose any base
>for argument, you say you won't join because you have been insulted.
<chuckle> I won't join because in the end, all this "deal" does is
put the USPL in the permantent position of "taxing" college paintball
without having to be accountable to give any benefits back and secure
continued growth. The fact that the contract has never been written
well just makes it easier to point this out. In any case, if all this
banter is apparently my sole objective, why come along and start up
two new topics of banter? Wouldn't slapping my name on two new topics
be exactly what you WOULDN'T want to do?
>Now, you are attacking the sponsors. Get over it, Chris. We are doing this
I havn't attacked a sponsor. I pointed out that keeping a discount
secret was silly.
University of Illinois Illini Paintball Warriors Alumni
2000 & 2001 National College Champions
National Collegiate Paintball Association