Rockets don't have a shot in hell!!!

Rockets don't have a shot in hell!!!

Post by D. Marbl » Wed, 21 May 1997 04:00:00


Earlier I picked the Jazz in 6 but this baby is going to be a sweep.
Rockets were to worn out by the SuperSonics, not that they would have beat
Utah anyway.

 
 
 

Rockets don't have a shot in hell!!!

Post by Ed Say » Wed, 21 May 1997 04:00:00

:
:
: Earlier I picked the Jazz in 6 but this baby is going to be a sweep.
: Rockets were to worn out by the SuperSonics, not that they would have beat
: Utah anyway.

        Well, when all your perimeter shooters brick the same game, even
        Hakeem can't do it all.  Looks like Hakeem will have his monster
        series, and the Chuckster is as contained as he can be.  Now,
        it's going to take Clyde, Maloney, Elie to hit those perimeter
        shots to open things up, and that could happen any game.  I won't
        count Houston dead until they're dead dead. :)

 
 
 

Rockets don't have a shot in hell!!!

Post by Kirk W. Hannem » Thu, 22 May 1997 04:00:00

On Tue, 20 May 1997 00:57:50 -0700, "D. Marble"

Quote:

>Earlier I picked the Jazz in 6 but this baby is going to be a sweep.
>Rockets were to worn out by the SuperSonics, not that they would have beat
>Utah anyway.

Marble giving the nod to the Jazz...who'da thunk it??

Kirk
--------
"It goes on and on, this insanity..."
            -Queensryche

 
 
 

Rockets don't have a shot in hell!!!

Post by Greg Benag » Thu, 22 May 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

> On Tue, 20 May 1997 00:57:50 -0700, "D. Marble"

> >Earlier I picked the Jazz in 6 but this baby is going to be a sweep.
> >Rockets were to worn out by the SuperSonics, not that they would have beat
> >Utah anyway.

> Marble giving the nod to the Jazz...who'da thunk it??

Not me, but given his past record for predictions, it's a good sign for
the Rockets.  ;)

Greg

 
 
 

Rockets don't have a shot in hell!!!

Post by D. Marbl » Thu, 22 May 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

> On Tue, 20 May 1997 00:57:50 -0700, "D. Marble"

> >Earlier I picked the Jazz in 6 but this baby is going to be a sweep.
> >Rockets were to worn out by the SuperSonics, not that they would have beat
> >Utah anyway.

> Marble giving the nod to the Jazz...who'da thunk it??

> Kirk
> --------
> "It goes on and on, this insanity..."
>             -Queensryche

I'm just saying that the Sonics would have given the Jazz a better run.
 
 
 

Rockets don't have a shot in hell!!!

Post by Kirk W. Hannem » Fri, 23 May 1997 04:00:00

On Wed, 21 May 1997 12:59:39 -0700, "D. Marble"

Quote:


>> On Tue, 20 May 1997 00:57:50 -0700, "D. Marble"

>> >Earlier I picked the Jazz in 6 but this baby is going to be a sweep.
>> >Rockets were to worn out by the SuperSonics, not that they would have beat
>> >Utah anyway.

>> Marble giving the nod to the Jazz...who'da thunk it??

>> Kirk
>> --------
>> "It goes on and on, this insanity..."
>>             -Queensryche

>I'm just saying that the Sonics would have given the Jazz a better run.

Ah, now I understand :)

Kirk
--------
"It goes on and on, this insanity..."
            -Queensryche

 
 
 

Rockets don't have a shot in hell!!!

Post by h.caulfi.. » Sat, 24 May 1997 04:00:00

`> I'm just saying that the Sonics would have given the Jazz a better run.

Maybe, but Seattle lost.

             ,-^,                 /~\o /-()   -- -  -
       _ ___/ /\|                 \_/ \\/ )   -- - --
   ,:`( )__,  ) ~                       |/_\   -- - --   -
  //  //   '--;  Simple Writes Extreme   \_/ .  . . .   ........
  '   \     | ^                            _   .   .     . . .
 ------^----^----                           -----------------