-----------
The Red Sox just (11:30 am in Boston) announced this trade with the Reds:
Sox send:
Tom Bolton
Reds send:
Billy Hatcher
Reds get more pitching - Sox get a centerfielder. Sounds decent for both
teams.
-Ron
The Red Sox just (11:30 am in Boston) announced this trade with the Reds:
Sox send:
Tom Bolton
Reds send:
Billy Hatcher
Reds get more pitching - Sox get a centerfielder. Sounds decent for both
teams.
-Ron
> Reds get more pitching - Sox get a centerfielder. Sounds decent for both
> teams.
-Steve
--
The opinions expressed above are those of the author and not SPSS, Inc.
-------------------
Steve Adams Fax: (312) 329-3558
> The Red Sox just (11:30 am in Boston) announced this trade with the Reds:
> Sox send:
> Tom Bolton
> Reds send:
> Billy Hatcher
> Reds get more pitching - Sox get a centerfielder. Sounds decent for both
> teams.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wisdom was not at the top of the graduate-school,
mountain but there in thesandpile at Sunday School.
> The Red Sox just (11:30 am in Boston) announced this trade with the Reds:
> Sox send:
> Tom Bolton
> Reds send:
> Billy Hatcher
> Reds get more pitching - Sox get a centerfielder. Sounds decent for both
> teams.
>-Ron
Dave Allison
>On a personal note, Bolton was a good pitcher. And again, Hatcher stinks to
>high heaven. He's been a bench warmer, and now he just might replace Marshall
>as the next Sox Grumbler.
Bolton has allowed 32 hits and 14 BB in 26 IP. This is good? Lefties
are batting .344 against him. Righties are hitting only .273.
Overall, batters are hitting .294 off of him with a .384 OBP!!!!! Wow.
If only the Red Sox had *anybody* who could hit like that!
Oh, you must have meant Bolton was good *last* year. Right?
Lessee... Last year opponents smoked him for 187 baserunners in 110
innings. Toss in *16* HR. In 110 IP. A .308 batting average, .378
OBP, and .485 SLG. Bolton is NOT good. Bolton is at *best* adequate.
Or maybe you meant that except for the last two years, Bolton has been
good? Career 4.54 ERA... 386 H in 339 IP with 149 BB coming into this
year!!!
Shit, he wasn't even a particularly good pitcher in 1990!
Anybody who thinks that Bolton is better than Hatcher has their head
up their ass (and that includes the Cincinnati GM). Hatcher is an
average fourth OF. Bolton sucks septic tanks!
Thank God he's gone!
-Valentine
--
Ron> The Red Sox just (11:30 am in Boston) announced this trade
Ron> with the Reds:
Ron> Sox send:
Ron> Tom Bolton
Ron> Reds send:
Ron> Billy Hatcher
Ron>
Ron> Reds get more pitching - Sox get a centerfielder. Sounds
Ron> decent for both teams.
Ron> -Ron
I don't mind too much losing Tom Bolton, but what did we get in
return? Is he going to do any better than say Bob Zupic? Anyone have
any numbers on the guy?
Thanks!
--
System Manager, Signal Processing and Interpretation Lab. Boston, Mass
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"But to risk we must, for the greatest hazard in life is to risk nothing. For
the man or woman who risks nothing, has nothing, does nothing, is nothing."
(Quote from the eulogy for the late Christa McAuliffe.)
>Bolton was *what*????? I'm happy to see him gone. I'd only be
>happier if they could get something for Young. (I liked the sounds of
>Young for O'Brien, as long as the Sox don't have to add *too* much
>more...)
>Bolton has allowed 32 hits and 14 BB in 26 IP. This is good? Lefties
>are batting .344 against him. Righties are hitting only .273.
>Overall, batters are hitting .294 off of him with a .384 OBP!!!!! Wow.
>If only the Red Sox had *anybody* who could hit like that!
The Mariner's GM, Woody Woodward, has been saying for the entire
season that there aren't any players available for trades.
And everyone else keeps making trades. Hmmm...
Anyway, Woodward said yesterday that the only untouchable players
on the M's are Ken Griffey, Jr. and Edgar Martinez.
I'm not sure who would want any of the others, but we
remain hopeful.
--
| U. of W., M.C.I.S. | (206) 685-3104 |
>>On a personal note, Bolton was a good pitcher. And again, Hatcher stinks to
>>high heaven. He's been a bench warmer, and now he just might replace Marshall
>>as the next Sox Grumbler.
> Bolton was *what*????? I'm happy to see him gone. I'd only be
> happier if they could get something for Young. (I liked the sounds of
> Young for O'Brien, as long as the Sox don't have to add *too* much
> more...)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wisdom was not at the top of the graduate-school,
mountain but there in thesandpile at Sunday School.
> yeah, you're one of those critical fans whose philosphy is if this
>guy pitches better than, say, Darwin, then he's a goodie.
Bolton has a few more years than Hatcher, you say. Why? Hatcher is
31, born on 10/04/60, and has a relatively healthy history. Bolton is
30, born on 05/06/62, has a long history of arm problems due to his
trick delivery.
>Adequate enough if they'd only let him pitch some more. All they used him in
>was for cleaning up after some pitcher who screwed up and got blown out.
>Well, true, but he pitched better than you could. Wouldn't he?
You seem to think Bolton has been effective. I suggest you review the
evidence. Look back to his 19 starts last year (with a 5+ ERA).
Consider the large numbers of hits he has allowed in relief this year.
Bolton is a better pitcher than I am, as you point out, but not by
enough to justify the waste of a roster space. And that goes double
for Matt Young! (And I wouldn't be *so* hurt to see Darwin go either,
though he at least is *occasionally* effective.)
-Valentine
--
>>> Shit, he wasn't even a particularly good pitcher in 1990!
>>Well, true, but he pitched better than you could. Wouldn't he?
> I'm sure he does. My fastball tops off at about 49 MPH. But
> that hardly makes him an effective major league pitcher, does it?
> You seem to think Bolton has been effective. I suggest you review the
> evidence. Look back to his 19 starts last year (with a 5+ ERA).
> Consider the large numbers of hits he has allowed in relief this year.
> Bolton is a better pitcher than I am, as you point out, but not by
> enough to justify the waste of a roster space. And that goes double
> for Matt Young! (And I wouldn't be *so* hurt to see Darwin go either,
> though he at least is *occasionally* effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wisdom was not at the top of the graduate-school,
mountain but there in thesandpile at Sunday School.
> And the fact is, Hatcher is injury-prone, I believe, but my facts on him
>aren't as long-winded as yours.
bert
-diehard sox fan (red that is)
Hey! What's this argument all about? We were lucky to get anything for Bolton,
let alone Billy Hatcher.
This so-called argument will be settled within a few weeks when Bolton starts
pissing off all of you Reds fans.
|> I wonder if there is an rule here on offensive language? If so, I'd like
|> to know the limitations. Hatcher is pretty much an overrated player in
|> my book. I seriously doubt his effectiveness in defense, but he's been
|> ripping the ball in his first couple of starts. I just hope he isnt a flash
|> in the pan, or I'll be laughing my ass all the way to Heaven on your load
|> of unbelievable horse-carping.
Can I use this in my .sig file?
|>
|> > Bolton has a few more years than Hatcher, you say. Why? Hatcher is
|> > 31, born on 10/04/60, and has a relatively healthy history. Bolton is
|> > 30, born on 05/06/62, has a long history of arm problems due to his
|> > trick delivery.
|>
|> And the fact is, Hatcher is injury-prone, I believe, but my facts on him
|> aren't as long-winded as yours.
|>
|> > Get your facts straight. Please! *19* of his 25 appearances last
|> > year were starts. He was horrible. He wasn't even adequate.
|> > Admittedly he has been pitching mop-up this year. But isn't that
|> > what you generally do with pitchers who repeatedly pitch their way
|> > out of the rotation?
...and Bolton has been given *plenty* of chances in his 3-4 year career with the
BoSox.
|>
|> Why couldnt they just dump Clark? Bolton is worth more for his contract
|> than Clark ever was on his contract.
That goes without saying. The need, however is for hitting, not pitching for
the Red Sox this year (oddly enough) They've tried to dump Clark's contract
several times, but there are no takers.
Is this a die hard Tom Bolton fan or what? I've never heard him defended so
vigorously. I was willing to give the guy the benefit of the doubt in his first
couple of years, but he's had plenty of chances to prove himself with Boston.
This trade was a good one. Even Minnie Minoso could help the Red Sox
offensively this year, so the Hatcher acquisition is a pretty good one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Joe Lundy Encore Computer Corporation, 6901 W. Sunrise Blvd. |
| "Wake up and smell the peanuts" - Hy Oxman, Ft. Lauderdale Yankees vendor |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Why couldnt they just dump Clark? Bolton is worth more for his contract
>than Clark ever was on his contract.
Clark was only the second-best offensive player the Sox had last year
(third-best if you count Plantier, who only played a third of a season).
From 1988 to 1990 he'd averaged 26 HR, 72 R, and 83 RBI.
In 1991, he gave the Sox........28 HR, 75 R, and 87 RBI. How was Clark
a letdown? Looks like they got just about precisely what they could expect
from a 35-year old.
--
....................................
the university of chicago law school
suffering from bozeman's syndrome
>>Why couldnt they just dump Clark? Bolton is worth more for his contract
>>than Clark ever was on his contract.
> For that matter, why not dump the whole team, and bring up the PawSox
> and pay them all minimum wage? Heck, they'd still win fifty or sixty
> games, and then they'd get the most bang for the buck by your criteria.
> Clark was only the second-best offensive player the Sox had last year
> (third-best if you count Plantier, who only played a third of a season).
> From 1988 to 1990 he'd averaged 26 HR, 72 R, and 83 RBI.
> In 1991, he gave the Sox........28 HR, 75 R, and 87 RBI. How was Clark
> a letdown? Looks like they got just about precisely what they could expect
> from a 35-year old.
Hmm, I believe my facts were based on this year, dude. try again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wisdom was not at the top of the graduate-school,
mountain but there in thesandpile at Sunday School.
...
--
UC San Diego ...!ucsd!cs!demers
La Jolla, CA 92093-0114 (619) 534-0688, or -8187, FAX: (619) 534-7029
2. Red Sox, Reds, and Padre Trade rumor
4. FS: Red Holzman RED ON RED and HOLZMAN oN HOOPS
5. 'Stros - Red Sox trade rumors
9. Trade Rumor "Twins/Astros/Red Sox"
10. Red Sox trade?
11. Red Sox Trade?
12. Red Sox reportedly trade prospects, Arrojo for Cliff Floyd
13. More trade rumors (Pirate/Red Sox)...