38-year-old Marciano vs 38-year-old Walcott

38-year-old Marciano vs 38-year-old Walcott

Post by Prof Marve » Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:02:54


To illustrate the silliness of the argument that a prime Walcott could
not beat a prime Marciano, consider this:

38-year-old Marciano vs 38-year-old Walcott.

Who wins?

But let's take it a step further, shall we?

Bearden will argue if Marciano were still living today, he'd still -- as
an 80-year old! -- be unbeatable, but what about a 27-year-old Walcott
meeting a prime Marciano? That's right, a Walcott 11 years younger than
the one who fought Marciano?

Would he have lost too?

prof marvel
--
http://www.cincyvoice.blogspot.com/

"The first human to hurl an insult instead of a stone, was the founder
of civilization."

-- Sigmund Freud

 
 
 

38-year-old Marciano vs 38-year-old Walcott

Post by DCI » Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:06:49

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:02:54 GMT, Prof Marvel

Quote:

>To illustrate the silliness of the argument that a prime Walcott could
>not beat a prime Marciano, consider this:

>38-year-old Marciano vs 38-year-old Walcott.

>Who wins?

>But let's take it a step further, shall we?

>Bearden will argue if Marciano were still living today, he'd still -- as
>an 80-year old! -- be unbeatable, but what about a 27-year-old Walcott
>meeting a prime Marciano? That's right, a Walcott 11 years younger than
>the one who fought Marciano?

>Would he have lost too?

>prof marvel

More specious reasoning, Professor. Your surfing in your "flat earth"
world.

DCI

 
 
 

38-year-old Marciano vs 38-year-old Walcott

Post by GDS » Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:16:38


Quote:
> To illustrate the silliness of the argument that a prime Walcott could not
> beat a prime Marciano, consider this:

> 38-year-old Marciano vs 38-year-old Walcott.

> Who wins?

> But let's take it a step further, shall we?

> Bearden will argue if Marciano were still living today, he'd still -- as
> an 80-year old! -- be unbeatable, but what about a 27-year-old Walcott
> meeting a prime Marciano? That's right, a Walcott 11 years younger than
> the one who fought Marciano?

> Would he have lost too?

49-0