To illustrate the silliness of the argument that a prime Walcott could
not beat a prime Marciano, consider this:
38-year-old Marciano vs 38-year-old Walcott.
But let's take it a step further, shall we?
Bearden will argue if Marciano were still living today, he'd still -- as
an 80-year old! -- be unbeatable, but what about a 27-year-old Walcott
meeting a prime Marciano? That's right, a Walcott 11 years younger than
the one who fought Marciano?
Would he have lost too?
"The first human to hurl an insult instead of a stone, was the founder
-- Sigmund Freud