Sport Today

> >Will you feel any differently about me the next morning if I put my
> >arm around you to say "nice match" if we ever get to play?

> Not considering all the other places where you say your hand will
> never be. The rule of "Methinks he doth protest too much" would lead
> me to shun any physical contact.

> > It does produce more spin, the advertising is true.

> Sorry Shane, but if you're going to make performance claims on behalf of
> Predator here, especially given your prior position there and the
> "authority" that seems to lend to your statements, you'll have to do
> more than say so.

> > .... As for the testing methodology, that I can't
> > disclose (sorry!)

> Too bad, because that's just what's needed to prove it's true.

> How about at least saying what you mean by "more spin"?

> I guess we'll have to do our own testing -- here's one that I've done
> that also shows what I think more spin should mean:

>> >Will you feel any differently about me the next morning if I put my
>> >arm around you to say "nice match" if we ever get to play?

>> Not considering all the other places where you say your hand will
>> never be. The rule of "Methinks he doth protest too much" would lead
>> me to shun any physical contact.

>Do I detect jomophobia in you Shakespeare?

>>> It does produce more spin, the advertising is true.

>> Sorry Shane, but if you're going to make performance claims on behalf of
>> Predator here, especially given your prior position there and the
>> "authority" that seems to lend to your statements, you'll have to do
>> more than say so.

>>> .... As for the testing methodology, that I can't
>>> disclose (sorry!)

>> Too bad, because that's just what's needed to prove it's true.

>> How about at least saying what you mean by "more spin"?

>> I guess we'll have to do our own testing -- here's one that I've done
>> that also shows what I think more spin should mean:

> Well gang...this post by Pat Johnson sums up everything I've been
> saying the entire time, which I get castigated for.  Shane comes on
> here to explain the answers to the questions, as best he can based on
> his agreement with Predator, and starts getting the slow slam dunk
> treatment from Saddam Johnson himself.  How dare Shane post something
> that goes against the teachings of the tribunal and not stick around
> to then be ground up into human powder. Do all of you think this is
> humorous, part and parcel of this NG, or is everyone just zombies?
> This isn't the search for answers and the truth, it's a venue for a
> sick, egomaniacal human being to use as his gameboard to debase and
> humiliate others into submission.  Wake the *** up!

> ....................Billy

> > [He thinks I'm out to get him -- I think...]

> I'm sure everybody's fascinated with your persecution complex, Billy.
> Why don't you start a special thread about it so all those interested
> can join you there?

> (I hear there's room at ASP...)
> Pat Johnson
> Chicago

> Nat
> Oxford, AR.

>>Hey Pat...why don't you just shut your scumbag mouth already.

> It does produce more spin, the advertising is true.

> What brand and model cue would you purchase if you could only spend up
> to one thousand dollars?

> Just curious,
> Jonathan

> > Jack, you're really starting to grow on me, not only for your point
> > counting but also because I don't think either one of us are
> > homophobic so I don't think you'll take it the wrong way or any way.

> Homophobes don't bother me much, heterophobes are starting to get me
> laughing some ... besides 3 points is 3 points, take em where you can
> get em.