Best 9-ball racking patterns?

Best 9-ball racking patterns?

Post by cbright9 » Sat, 17 Sep 2005 23:19:27


Hi all,

Starting to get much more into 9-ball and was wondering if there is an
optimal rack? Especially when you're giving an an opponent the 8.

I always rack in this pattern... just because it seems to distribute
the balls evenly.

  1
 6 8
2 9 4
 5 7
  3

Comments?
Links to articals about racking?

I figure you often make the 6 or 8 depending on the side you're
breaking on, so if your giving the 8 you might as well let your
opponent make it off the break because it will either stay down or be
spotted. (in the rules I've played anyways)

Chris

 
 
 

Best 9-ball racking patterns?

Post by Ruf.. » Sun, 18 Sep 2005 01:59:47

I like the following pattern for 9 ball.

          1
         35
        798
         46
          2

If I was spotting the 9 i'd put it in the 3 or 5 spot as those balls
are infrequently made on the break.

Rufus

 
 
 

Best 9-ball racking patterns?

Post by Ed Chauvin I » Sun, 18 Sep 2005 03:08:33


Quote:
>I like the following pattern for 9 ball.

>          1
>         35
>        798
>         46
>          2

>If I was spotting the 9 i'd put it in the 3 or 5 spot as those balls
>are infrequently made on the break.

I'll spot you the 9, if you spot me the 8.

Ed Chauvin IV

--
DISCLAIMER : WARNING: RULE # 196 is *** in that to calculate L,
use X = [(C2/10)^2], and RULE # 193 which is NOT meant to be read by
kids, since RULE # 187 EXPLAINS ***ity mathematically, using

"I always feel left out when someone *else* gets killfiled."
                           --Terry Austin

 
 
 

Best 9-ball racking patterns?

Post by Saturated Fat » Sun, 18 Sep 2005 05:37:30

Here's the pattern I use. It came from an article by Buddy Hall. The
idea is to make as hard as possible for the breaker by putting maximum
distance between successive balls.

  1
 7 8
5 9 6
 4 2
  3

He practices what he preaches. I have seen him rack this way everytime
in more than one tournament.

Ideally, after breaking, the balls would be arranged something like
this:

At one end: 1 3 5 7 9

At the other end: 2 4 6 8

And the breaker would be forced to do a lot of extra travelling.

 
 
 

Best 9-ball racking patterns?

Post by Gregor » Sun, 18 Sep 2005 10:12:47

Sat Fats wrote

Quote:
>   1
>  7 8
> 5 9 6
>  4 2
>   3

> Ideally, after breaking, the balls would be arranged something like
this:

> At one end: 1 3 5 7 9

> At the other end: 2 4 6 8

> And the breaker would be forced to do a lot of extra travelling.

As the breaker stands behind the head string, what side of the table
does he break from?
 
 
 

Best 9-ball racking patterns?

Post by Jerr » Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:09:52



[snip]

Quote:
>He practices what he preaches. I have seen him rack this way everytime
>in more than one tournament.

>Ideally, after breaking, the balls would be arranged something like
>this:

>At one end: 1 3 5 7 9

>At the other end: 2 4 6 8

>And the breaker would be forced to do a lot of extra travelling.

If he doesn't make any balls on the break then it is you that has to do
the extra travelling.
 
 
 

Best 9-ball racking patterns?

Post by Rufu » Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:59:20

I meant to type... "If I was spotting the 8 ball..."   but if I spot
you the eight will you spot me the 1 and the breaks?

:)

Rufus

 
 
 

Best 9-ball racking patterns?

Post by fastlarrygunin.. » Wed, 21 Sep 2005 01:44:47

If I rack for you:  135697248
If I rack for me:  1  34  698  57 2
1-2 go up table with my cue ball.  I make the corner 8 every time,
hardest ball to make on the table because of dark color.  I give the
world the 8, so it does not matter as when I break, I eliminate it off
the table on the snap.

More infor like this is at:

www.fastlarrypool.net
www.poolchat.net

 
 
 

Best 9-ball racking patterns?

Post by Saturated Fat » Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:27:56

I guess I don't understand the question. I would say that the breaker
breaks from whatever side he chooses - after the balls are racked.
 
 
 

Best 9-ball racking patterns?

Post by Saturated Fat » Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:31:04

You're not suggesting we should make the pattern as easy as possible,
in case the breaker doesn't make a ball?